Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-06-08 · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

490 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/06/08/00-14476

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4830-01-U EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 29 CFR Part 1630 Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This rule rescinds several sentences of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's
(EEOC)Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act that address mitigating measures used by persons with impairments. This action is necessary as a result of recent Supreme Court rulings. EFFECTIVE DATE: June 8, 2000. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher J. Kuczynski, Assistant Legal Counsel, ADA Division, Office of Legal Counsel, or Sharon Rennert, Senior Attorney Advisor, ADA Division, Office of Legal Counsel. They can be reached at 202-663-4503. This final rule is also available in the following formats: large print, braille, electronic file on computer disk, and audio-tape. Copies may be obtained from the EEOC's Publication Center by calling 1-800-669-3362 (voice) or 1-800-800-3302 (TDD). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EEOC is rescinding several sentences of the Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act, found in the Appendix to 29 CFR 1630.2(h) and (j), that address mitigating measures used by persons with impairments. The guidance set forth in those sentences is no longer valid in light of the Supreme Court's rulings in *Sutton * v. *United Airlines, Inc., * 527 U.S. __(1999), and *Murphy * v. *United Parcel Service, Inc., * 527 U.S.—(1999). In those cases, the Supreme Court held that the determination of whether an individual has an impairment that substantially limits a major life activity under the ADA must be made by considering any mitigating measures (such as medications or assistive devices) that the individual uses to eliminate or reduce the effects of an impairment. Regulatory Procedures Regulatory Flexibility Act In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Public Law 96-354, as amended by Public Law 104-121), the Commission has reviewed this regulation, and by approving it, certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Executive Order 12866 This rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866 and is therefore not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1630 Equal employment opportunity, Individuals with disabilities. For the Commission. Ida L. Castro, Chairwoman. Accordingly, the Commission amends 29 CFR chapter XIV as follows: PART 1630—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 1630 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12116. Appendix to Part 1630 [Amended] 2. Amend the Appendix to Part 1630 as follows: a. Section 1630.2(h) is amended by removing the second paragraph. b. Section 1630.2(j) is amended by removing the third, fourth, and fifth sentences of the sixth paragraph, and by removing “, without regard to mitigating measures such as medicines, or assistive or prosthetic devices” from the first sentence of the eighth paragraph. [FR Doc. 00-14476 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
3 references not yet in our index
  • 29 CFR 1630
  • Pub. L. 96-354
  • Pub. L. 104-121
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite29 CFR 1630
Pub. L.Pub. L. 96-354
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-121
Cites 7Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.