Rules and Regulations. Notice; request for comments

Agency: Office of the United States Trade Representative
Action: Notice; request for comments
Citation: FR Doc. 00-13427 · Docket No. WTO/DS-192

Summary

The Office of the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) is providing notice of Pakistan's request for the establishment of a dispute settlement panel under the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (“WTO”). Pakistan challenges the United States' action of imposing a transitional safeguard on imports of combed cotton yarn from Pakistan. In this dispute, Pakistan alleges that ths safeguard measure is inconsistent with certain ogligations under the WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing. USTR invites written comments from the public concerning the issues raised in this dispute.

Dates

Although USTR will accept any comments received during the course of the dispute settlement proceedings, comments should be submitted by July 7, 2000, to be assured of timely consideration by USTR in preparing its first written submission to the panel.

Supplementary Information

Pursuant to section 127(b) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) (19 U.S.C. 3537(b)(1)), USTR is providing notice that Pakistan has submitted a request for the establishment of a WTO dispute settlement panel to examine the U.S. transitional safeguard measure on imports of combed cotton yard from Pakistan. The WTO Dispute Settlement Body (“DSB”) is expected to establish a panel for this purpose in June 2000. Major Issues Raised and Legal Basis of the Complaint Pakistan challenges the transitional safeguard measure the United States imposed on March 17, 1999, on imports of combed cotton yarn from Pakistan. In its request for a panel to examine the measure, Pakistan alleges that the U.S. transitional safeguard measure is inconsistent with Article 2.4 of the WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (“ATC”) and is not justified by Article 6 of the ATC. Pakistan further maintains that the U.S. measure does not meet the requirements for transitional safeguards set out in paragraphs 2, 3, 4, and 7 of Article 6 of the ATC because the United States allegedly: • Made its determination of serious damage, or actual threat thereof, to its domestic industry producing like and/or directly competitive products, by (a) excluding from its determination a significant proportion of the production of like products by its domestic industry and (b) without taking into account all factors relevant to the state of its domestic industry; • Failed to demonstrate that the alleged serious damage, or actual threat thereof to the domestic industry was being caused by increased imports; • Attributed the alleged damage, or actual threat thereof, to its domestic industry solely to imports from Pakistan to the exclusion of imports from other sources, including unrestrained sources; • Based its determination of serious damage, or actual threat thereof, on a comparison of data for an eight-month period in 1997 and 1998, which is in the view of Pakistan a period too short to determine whether the alleged damage, or actual threat thereof, was serious; and • Relied on partial and unverified information. The United States and Pakistan consulted on this issue on February 10 and 11, 1999, but were unable to reach a mutually satisfactory solution to the matter. The WTO Textile Monitoring Body (“TMB”) reviewed the U.S. measure on April 29, 1999, but determined in its report that “it was not in a position to assess without doubt whether or not serious damage had been caused to the US' industry producing products like and/or directly competitive with combed cotton yarn * * ” (G/TMB/18). The TMB therefore recommended that the United States rescind the measure. On May 27, 1999, the United States informed the TMB that it was unable to conform to this recommendation. The TMB subsequently reviewed and reaffirmed its recommendation, and in an August 6, 1999, letter to the TMB the United States renewed its determination to retain the temporary safeguard measure. Pakistan considers this matter to be unresolved and that the parties have—through the TMB—satisfied the consultation requirement of Article 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputers (“DSU”). Accordingly, on April 3, 2000, Pakistan requested the establishment of a dispute settlement panel pursuant to Article 8:10 of the ATC, Article XXIII:2 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (“GATT 1994”), and Article 6 of the DSU. Public Comment: Requirements for Submissions Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning the issues raised in this dispute. Comments must be in English and provided in fifteen copies to Sandy McKinzy at the address provided above. A person requesting that information contained in a comment submitted by that person be treated as confidential business information must certify that such information is business confidential and would not customarily be released to the public by the submitting person. Confidential business information must be clearly marked “BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL” in a contrasting color ink at the top of each page of each copy. Information or advice contained in a comment submitted, other than business confidential information, may be determined by USTR to be confidential in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2155(g)(2)). If the submitting person believes that information or advice may qualify as such, the submitting person— (1) Must so designate the information or advice; (2) Must clearly mark the material as “SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE” in a contrasting color ink at the top of each page of each copy; and (3) Is encouraged to provide a non-confidential summary of the information or advice. Pursuant to section 127(e) of the URAA (19 U.S.C. 3537(e)), USTR will maintain a file on this dispute settlement proceeding, accessible to the public, in the USTR Reading Room: Room 101, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20508. The public file will include a listing of any comments received by USTR from the public with respect to the proceeding; the U.S. submissions to the panel in the proceeding, the submissions, or non-confidential summaries of submissions, to the panel received from other parties in the dispute, as well as the report of the dispute settlement panel, and, if applicable, the report of the Appellate Body. An appointment to review the public file (Docket WTO/DS-192, “Combed Cotton Yarn—Pakistan”) may be made by calling Brenda Webb, (202) 395-6186. The Reading Room is open to the public from 9:30 a.m. to 12 noon and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. A. Jane Bradley, Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Monitoring and Enforcement. [FR Doc. 00-13427 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am]