Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-05-30 · DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE · Notices

Notices. Proposed collection; comments request

454 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/05/30/00-13382·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-24-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Export Administration Defense Priorities and Allocations System ACTION: Proposed collection; comments request. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before July 31, 2000. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Linda Engelmeier, Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6066, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at lengelme@doc.gov). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions should be directed to Dawnielle Battle, BXA ICB Liaison, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Management, Department of Commerce, Room 6881, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Abstract The record keeping requirement is necessary for administration and enforcement of delegated authority under the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2061, *et seq.* ) and the Selective Service Act of 1948 (50 U.S.C. App. 468). Any person who receives a priority rated order under the implementing Defense Priorities and Allocations System regulation (15 CFR 700) must retain records for at least 3 years. II. Method of Collection Records retention.
III. Data *OMB Number:* 0694-0053. *Form Number:* None. *Type of Review:* Regular submission. *Affected Public:* Businesses and other for-profit institutions, small businesses or organizations. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 700,000. *Estimated Time Per Response:* 1 to 31.5 minutes. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 14,477 hours. *Estimated Total Record Keeping Costs:* $10,150. *Estimated Total Annual Cost:* No start-up costs or capital expenditures. IV. Request for Comments *Comments are invited on:*
(a)Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the function of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: May 23, 2000. Madeleine Clayton, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 00-13382 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 104-13
  • 15 CFR 700
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Proposed collection; comments request
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-13
Cite15 CFR 700
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.