Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-05-16 · National Endowment for the Humanities, NFAH · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice

470 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/05/16/00-12314·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: National Endowment for the Humanities, NFAH
Action: Notice
Citation: FR Doc. 00-12314

Summary

The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) has submitted the following public information collection request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval as required by the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13,44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Copies of this ICR, with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by calling Susan G. Daisey, Deputy Director, Grants Office, the National Endowment for the Humanities (202-606-8494) or may be requested by e-mail to . Comments should be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the National Endowment for the Humanities, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503 (202-3995-7316), within 30 days from the date of this publication in the Federal Register.

Supplementary Information

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is particularly interested in comments which: (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submissions of responses. Agency: National Endowment for the Humanities. *Title of Proposal: * Generic Clearance Authority for the National Endowment for the Humanities. *OMB Number: * 3136-0134. *Frequency of Collection: * On occasion. *Affected Public: * Applicants to NEH grant programs, reviewers of NEH grant applications, and NEH grantees. *Number of Respondents: * 20,569. *Estimated Time Per Respondent: * Varied according to type of information collection. *Estimated Total Burden Hours: * 91,301 hours. *Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost: * 0. *Total Annual Costs (operating/maintaining systems or purchasing services): * 0. *Description: * This submission requests approval from OMB for a three year extension of NEH's currently approved generic clearance authority for all NEH information collections other than one-time evaluations, questionnaires and surveys. Generic clearance authority would include approval of forms and instructions for application to NEH grant programs, reporting forms for NEH grantees, panelists and reviewers and for program evaluation purposes.

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 104-13
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-13
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.