Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-04-21 · DEPARTMENT OF LABOR · Notices

Notices. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

473 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/04/21/00-9972·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [NAFTA-3578 and TA-W-37,035; Court Metal Finishing, Inc., Flint, Michigan] Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration On March 31, 2000, the Department issued an Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers and former workers of the subject firm denied eligibility to apply for North American Free Trade Agreement-Transitional Adjustment Assistance (NAFTA-TAA).
The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19390). The petitioners presented information regarding customer imports from Mexico of articles like or directly competitive with those produced at the workers' firm. The January 6, 2000, denial of NAFTA-TAA for workers of Court Metal Finishing, Inc., Flint, Michigan, engaged in employment related to the production of valves was based on the finding that criteria
(3)and
(4)of the Group Eligibility Requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, were not met. The investigation revealed that there were no company or customer imports of valves from Mexico or Canada during the time period relevant to the investigation. Court Metal Finishing, Inc. did not shift production of valves from the Flint, Michigan plant to Mexico or Canada. On reconsideration, the Department conducted an additional survey of the subject firm's major declining customers. The responses revealed that a major declining customer increased imports of valves from Mexico or Canada while reducing purchases from Court Metal Finishing, Inc. The Department, on its own motion, reviewed the findings of the January 6, 2000 Trade Adjustment Assistance
(TAA)negative determination applicable to workers of the subject firm, petition number TA-W-37,035. The investigation review shows that with the new customer information obtained on reconsideration of NAFTA-3578, all criteria of the Group Eligibility Requirements of section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974 are met. Conclusion After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on reconsideration, it is concluded that the workers of Court Metal Finishing, Inc., Flint, Michigan, were adversely affected by increased imports, including those from Mexico or Canada, of articles like or directly competitive with those produced at the subject firm. All workers of Court Metal Finishing, Inc., Flint, Michigan, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after November 1, 1998, through two years from the date of this issuance are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974. All workers of Court Metal Finishing, Inc., Flint, Michigan, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after October 15, 1998 through two years from the date of this issuance are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of April 2000. Grant D. Beale, Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 00-9972 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.