Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-03-24 · DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE · Notices

Notices. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

451 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/03/24/00-7296

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in the case of *United States and Communities for a Better Environment* v. *Sorenson Engineering, Inc.,* Civil Action No. EDCV 96-444-RT
(VAPx)(C.D. Cal.), was lodged with the United States District Court for the Central District of California on March 2, 2000. The proposed consent decree resolves claims that the United States asserted against Sorenson Engineering, Inc. in a civil complaint in intervention filed concurrently with the lodging of the consent decree. The complaint in intervention alleges that Sorenson failed to timely submit a toxic chemical release form for nitric acid and phosphoric acid in each year from 1990 through 1995, in violation of the requirements of section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-know Act, 42 U.S.C. 11023. The proposed consent decree requires defendant to pay a civil penalty of $32,500. In addition, defendant is required to undertake two supplemental environmental projects to reduce tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene) emissions and to eliminate hexavalent chromium emissions at defendant's facility in Yucaipa, California. Finally, defendant is required to pay $20,000 to Communities for a Better Environment
(CBE)in payment of CBE's attorney's fees and costs in this action. The Department of Justice will accept comments relating to this consent decree for a period of thirty
(30)days from the date of this publication. Address your comments to the Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and send a copy to the Environmental Enforcement Section, U.S. Department of Justice, 301 Howard Street, Suite 870, San Francisco, CA 94105, Attn: Robert Mullaney. Your comments should refer to *United States and Communities for a Better Environment* v. *Sorenson Engineering, Inc.,* Civil Action No. EDCV 96-444-RT
(VAPx)(C.D. Cal.), and DOJ No. 90-11-2-06467. You may examine the proposed consent decree at the office of the United States Attorney, Central District of California, Federal Building, Room 7516, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. You may also obtain a copy of the consent decree by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044. Your request for a copy of the consent decree should refer to *United States and Communities for a Better Environment* v. *Sorenson Engineering, Inc.,* Civil Action No. EDCV 96-444-RT
(VAPx)(D.C. Cal.), and DOJ No. 90-11-2-06467, and must include a check for $4.50 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the “Consent Decree Library.” Joel Gross, Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 00-7296 Filed 3-23-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.