Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-03-24 · Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule; reopening of comment period and notice of public hearing

749 words·~3 min read·/register/2000/03/24/00-7169·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior
Action: Proposed rule; reopening of comment period and notice of public hearing
Citation: FR Doc. 00-7169 · RIN 1018-AF81 · 50 CFR 17

Summary

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) gives notice of a public hearing on the proposed rule to list the Santa Barbara distinct population of the California tiger salamander. In addition, the comment period which originally closed on March 20, 2000, will be reopened. The new comment period and hearing will allow all interested parties to submit oral or written comments on the proposal.

Dates

The comment period for this proposal now closes on May 4, 2000. Any comments received by the closing date will be considered in the final decision on this proposal. The public hearing will be held from 6:00 p.m. until 8:00 p.m. on April 20, 2000, in Santa Maria, California.

Supplementary Information

Background On January 19, 2000, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) published a notice in the Federal Register (65 FR 3110) proposing to list the Santa Barbara County distinct vertebrate population segment of the California tiger salamander, Ambystoma californiense, as endangered pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (Act). An emergency rule listing the population was published concurrently in the same issue of the Federal Register . The Santa Barbara County population segment of the California tiger salamander is endemic to low elevation (typically below 300 meters (1,000 feet)) vernal pools and seasonal ponds and the surrounding grasslands, oak woodlands, and coastal scrub of Santa Barbara County, California; and is imperiled primarily by habitat loss from conversion of natural habitat to intensive agriculture and urban development, habitat fragmentation, and agricultural contaminants. Section 4(b)(5)(E) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. ), requires that a public hearing be held if it is requested within 45 days of the publication of a proposed rule. In response to three such requests, the Service will hold a public hearing on the date and at address described in the DATES and ADDRESSES sections above. Anyone wishing to make an oral statement for the record is encouraged to provide a written copy of their statement and present it to the Service at the hearing. In the event there is a large attendance, the time allotted for oral statements may be limited. Oral and written statements receive equal consideration. There are no limits to the length of written comments presented at the hearing or mailed to the Service. Legal notices announcing the date, time, and location of the hearing will be published in newspapers concurrently with the Federal Register notice. Comments from the public regarding the accuracy of this proposed rule are sought, especially regarding: (1) Biological, commercial trade, or other relevant data concerning any threat (or lack thereof) to the species listed above; (2) The location of any additional populations of the species and the reasons why any habitat should or should not be determined to be critical habitat as provided by section 4 of the Act; (3) Additional information concerning the range, distribution, and population sizes of the species; and (4) Current or planned activities in the subject area and their possible impacts on the species. Reopening of the comment period will enable the Service to respond to the request for a public hearing on the proposed action. The comment period on this proposal now closes on May 4, 2000. Written comments should be submitted to the Service office listed in the ADDRESSES section. Author: The primary author of this notice is Carl Benz (see ADDRESSES ). Authority: The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544). Elizabeth H. Stevens, Acting Manager—California/Nevada Operations Office. [FR Doc. 00-7169 Filed 3-23-00; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
2 references not yet in our index
  • 50 CFR 17
  • 16 USC 1531-1544
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule; reopening of comment period and notice of public hearing
Cite50 CFR 17
Cite16 USC 1531-1544
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.