Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-03-17 · Railroad Retirement Board · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

497 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/03/17/00-6594·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Railroad Retirement Board
Action: Final rule
Citation: FR Doc. 00-6594 · RIN 3220-AB41 · 20 CFR 220

Summary

The Railroad Retirement Board (Board) amends its regulations to increase from $500 to $700 the average monthly earnings guidelines used to determine whether work done by an individual may be considered regular employment. This change coincides with an increase in the guidelines contained in the regulations of the Social Security Administration for determining substantial gainful activity that became effective July 1, 1999.

Dates

Effective Date: This rule is effective March 17, 2000. Applicability Date: This rule will be applied to all disability claims for which a final decision had not been rendered as of July 1, 1999.

Supplementary Information

The Railroad Retirement Act provides for disability annuities for employees, widow(er)s, and children of deceased railroad employees who are unable to engage in any regular employment because of a permanent physical or mental impairment. Regular employment is defined by reference to the definition of substantial gainful activity under the Social Security Act. Sections 220.141 and 220.142 of the Board's regulations reflect this definition and define “substantial gainful activity” (SGA) as work activity that involves doing significant physical or mental activities for pay or profit. Work activity is gainful if it is the kind of work usually done for pay or profit, whether or not a profit is realized. Section 220.143 sets forth earnings levels at which the Board considers a disabled person to be engaged in SGA regardless of the severity of his or her impairment. The amount of average monthly earnings that ordinarily demonstrates SGA for people with an impairment has not been increased since January 1, 1990. Consequently, with respect to months after June 1999 the Board raises from $500 to $700 the average monthly earnings guidelines used to determine whether work done by a person with a disability is substantial gainful activity. The Board has determined that an increase in the amount of earnings that constitutes SGA provides an updated indicator of when earnings demonstrate the ability to engage in SGA and is a significant improvement to the existing incentives to encourage individuals with disabilities to attempt to work. This increase also conforms to changes in the regulations of the Social Security Administration which became effective July 1, 1999 (64 FR 18566, April 15, 1999; a correction appears at 64 FR 22903, April 28, 1999). The Board published this rule as an interim final rule on November 18, 1999 (64 FR 62976) and invited comments by July 18, 2000. No comments were received. Accordingly, the interim final rule is adopted as a final rule without change. Dated: March 8, 2000. By Authority of the Board. Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the Board. [FR Doc. 00-6594 Filed 3-16-00; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 20 CFR 220
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite20 CFR 220
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.