Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-01-28 · Surface Transportation Board · Notices

Notices. Proposed adoption of a Railroad Cost Recovery Procedures productivity adjustment

291 words·~1 min read·/register/2000/01/28/00-1998·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Surface Transportation Board [STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub No. 4)] Railroad Cost Recovery Procedures-Productivity Adjustment AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board. ACTION: Proposed adoption of a Railroad Cost Recovery Procedures productivity adjustment. SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board proposes to adopt 1.035 (3.5%) as the measure of average growth in railroad productivity for the 1994-1998 (5-year) period. The current value of 5.7% was developed for the 1993 to 1997 period.
DATES: Comments are due by February 11, 2000. EFFECTIVE DATE: The proposed productivity adjustment is effective 30 days after the date of service. ADDRESSES: Send comments (an original and 10 copies) referring to STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub-No. 4) to: Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, 1925 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20423-0001. Parties should submit all pleading and attachments on a 3.5-inch diskette in WordPerfect 6.0 or 6.1 compatible format. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
H. Jeff Warren,
(202)565-1533. TDD for the hearing impaired:
(202)565-1695. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision write to, call, or pick up in person from: DA•TO•DA OFFICE SOLUTIONS, Suite 210, 1925 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20423-0001, telephone
(202)289-4357. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD services
(202)565-1695.] This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or energy conservation. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Decided: January 21, 2000. By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Burkes, and Commissioner Clyburn. Vernon A. Williams, Secretary. [FR Doc. 00-1998 Filed 1-27-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Proposed adoption of a Railroad Cost Recovery Procedures productivity adjustment
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.