Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-01-18 · DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR · Notices

Notices. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

505 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/01/18/00-1115

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [ES-030-1430-00] ES-50582, Group 547, Minnesota Notice of filing of plat of an island; Minnesota 1. The plat of the survey of an island in Cedar Lake, Township 117 North, Range 30 West, Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota, accepted on January 6, 2000, will be officially filed in Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia at 7:30 a.m., on February 22, 2000. The tract shown below describes the island omitted from the original survey.
Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota T. 117 N. R. 30 W. Tract No. 42. 2. Tract No. 42 is firm land rising 10-15 ft. above the ordinary high water mark. The soil has evolved from glacial till parent material and is similar to the soil found on the adjacent uplands. Numerous stones were located along the northerly and westerly shore line and at the highest points of the island. Tree species consist of ash, basswood, cedar, cottonwood, elm, oak and willow, ranging in size from 3 to 20 inches in diameter, with a maximum age of 120+ years.
The ground cover consists of hazel, willow, cattails and native grasses along the southerly shore line. 3. The present water level of the lake compares favorably with that of the lake at the time of the original survey; therefore, the elevation and upland character of the island along with the depth and width of the lake between the adjacent upland and the island are considered evidence that the island did exist in 1858, the year Minnesota was admitted to the Union. The original survey in 1857 did not note the presence of this island. 4.
Tract No. 42 is more than 50 percent upland in character within the interpretation of the Swamp and Overflow Act of September 28, 1850 (9 Stat. 519) as extended to the State of Minnesota under the Act of March 12, 1860 (12 Stat. 3). Therefore, the island is held to be public land. 5. The survey was requested by the Assistant Field Manager, Division of Natural Resource Management, under the authority of Section 211 of FLPMA (43 U.S.C. 1721) and the Minnesota Public Lands Improvement Act of 1990, Public Law 101-442 (104 Stat. 1020). 6.
Except for valid existing rights, this island will not be subject to application, petition, location or selection under any public law until February 22, 2000. 7. Interested parties protesting the determination that these islands are public land of the United States, must present valid proof showing that the island in question did not exist at the time of statehood or that it was attached to the mainland at the time of the original survey. Such protests must be submitted in writing to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153, prior to 7:30 a.m., February 22, 2000.
Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and prepayment of the appropriate fee. Dated: January 6, 2000. Stephen G. Kopach, Chief Cadastral Surveyor. [FR Doc. 00-1115 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 101-442
  • 104 Stat. 1020
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Pub. L.Pub. L. 101-442
Stat.104 Stat. 1020
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.