Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · PUBLIC-PRIVATE-LAW · 115th Congress · Public Law 115-135

Public Law 115-135. Taiwan Travel Act

491 words·~2 min read·/plaw/115/public/135

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

An Act To encourage visits between the United States and Taiwan at all levels, and for other purposes.Mar. 16, 2018[[H.R. 535](/us/bill/115/hr/535)] * Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa­tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,* Taiwan Travel Act. ## SECTION 1 SHORT TITLE This Act may be cited as the “Taiwan Travel Act”. ## SEC. 2 FINDINGS Congress finds the following: ####
(1)The Taiwan Relations Act ([22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.](/us/usc/t22/s3301/etseq)), enacted in 1979, has continued for 37 years to be a cornerstone of relations between the United States and Taiwan and has served as an anchor for peace and security in the Western Pacific area. ####
(2)The Taiwan Relations Act declares that peace and stability in the Western Pacific area are in the political, security, and economic interests of the United States and are matters of international concern. ####
(3)The United States considers any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes, a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of grave concern to the United States. ####
(4)Taiwan has succeeded in a momentous transition to democracy beginning in the late 1980s and has been a beacon of democracy in Asia, and Taiwan’s democratic achievements inspire many countries and people in the region. ####
(5)Visits to a country by United States Cabinet members and other high-ranking officials are an indicator of the breadth and depth of ties between the United States and such country. ####
(6)Since the enactment of the Taiwan Relations Act, relations between the United States and Taiwan have suffered from insufficient high-level communication due to the self-imposed restrictions that the United States maintains on high-level visits with Taiwan. ## SEC. 3 SENSE OF CONGRESS; STATEMENT OF POLICY ###
(a)Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that the United States Government should encourage visits between officials from the United States and Taiwan at all levels. ###
(b)Statement of Policy It should be the policy of the United States to—132 STAT. 342 ####
(1)allow officials at all levels of the United States Government, including Cabinet-level national security officials, general officers, and other executive branch officials, to travel to Taiwan to meet their Taiwanese counterparts; ####
(2)allow high-level officials of Taiwan to enter the United States, under conditions which demonstrate appropriate respect for the dignity of such officials, and to meet with officials of the United States, including officials from the Department of State and the Department of Defense and other Cabinet agencies; and ####
(3)encourage the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office, and any other instrumentality established by Taiwan, to conduct business in the United States, including activities which involve participation by Members of Congress, officials of Federal, State, or local governments of the United States, or any high-level official of Taiwan. Approved March 16, 2018.
Connections103 cite this · traces to 1
Cited by 103 sections · top 60
statutes-at-large
bill
Citation graph
cites case law
Public Law 115-135
Taiwan Travel Act
Bills×65
Stat.×13
Pub. L.×10
Stat. Comp.×9
U.S.C.×6
Cites 1Cited by 103 across 5 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.