Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Oregon · ORS Chapter 221 · Appeals

221.405 Validity of charter or ordinance provision determined before merits

212 words·~1 min read·/or/ors-chapter-221/appeals/221-405·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

221.405 Validity of charter or ordinance provision determined before merits.
(1)Whenever a defendant is charged with violating a provision of a city charter or ordinance and the defendant challenges the validity of the charter or ordinance provision, a municipal judge shall determine such issue and enter an order thereon before deciding the case on its merits.
(2)If the municipal judge declares the charter or ordinance provision invalid, the city may appeal from the municipal court to the circuit court. If the circuit court affirms the municipal court’s determination, the city may appeal to the Court of Appeals as provided in ORS 138.057 in a proceeding involving a violation, or as provided in ORS 138.010 to 138.310 in a proceeding involving a misdemeanor. If a city so appeals, while the appellate decision is pending, the defendant shall be released, with or without bond, for reappearance at the discretion of the trial court until such time as the case is remanded.
(3)If the municipal court declares the charter or ordinance provision valid, the municipal court may proceed to try the matter. If the municipal court convicts the defendant of violating the charter or ordinance provision, the defendant may appeal the judgment of conviction as provided in ORS 221.407. [2025 c.268 §50]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.