Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Oklahoma · Title 76 — Torts

§76-80. Safety of premises - Liability to trespasser.

497 words·~2 min read·/ok/title-76-torts/76-80·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

A. A possessor of land, including an owner, lessee, or other occupant, has no duty to make its premises safe for a trespasser and is not subject to liability for any injury to a trespasser.
B. Notwithstanding subsection A of this section, a possessor of land may be subject to liability for physical injury or death to a trespasser in the following situations:
1. A land possessor who knows or reasonably should know of a trespasser’s presence on the premises has a duty not to injure that trespasser by a wanton or intentional act, except as permitted by Sections 643 and 1289.25 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes; or
2. A land possessor may be subject to liability for physical injury or death to a child trespasser from a highly dangerous
artificial condition on the land if the plaintiff establishes all of the following:
a. the possessor knew or had reason to know that children
were likely to trespass at the location of the
condition,
b. the condition is one the possessor knew or reasonably
should have known was unusually attractive to children
and involved an unreasonable risk of death or serious
bodily harm,
c. the injured child was attracted onto the premises by
the condition,
d. the child lacked the ability to appreciate or realize
the risk,
e. the utility to the possessor of maintaining the
condition and the burden of eliminating the danger
were slight as compared with the risk to the child
involved, and
f. the child’s injury was directly caused by the
possessor’s failure to exercise reasonable care to
eliminate the danger or otherwise protect the child.
As a matter of law, a child under seven
(7)years of age has no ability to appreciate the risk from highly dangerous artificial conditions. A child between seven
(7)and fourteen
(14)years of age is presumed to lack the ability to appreciate the risk from highly dangerous artificial conditions; this presumption may be overcome if the possessor proves by the greater weight of the evidence that the child had the ability to appreciate the danger on the premises at the time of the harm. A child trespasser who is fourteen
(14)years of age or older has the burden of proving by the greater weight of the evidence that the child lacked the ability to appreciate the danger on the premises at the time of the harm.
C. “Trespasser” means a person who enters the real estate of another without the permission of the person lawfully entitled to possession. Permission may be either expressed or implied.
D. 1. This section shall not affect Section 16-71.7 of Title 2 of the Oklahoma Statutes relating to trespass upon agricultural land or Section 10.1 of Title 76 of the Oklahoma Statutes relating to trespass upon land used for recreational purposes not for profit.
2. This section shall not create or increase the liability of any person or entity. Added by Laws 2011, c. 234, § 9.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.