Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Oklahoma · Title 44 — Militia

§44-848. Contempt.

573 words·~3 min read·/ok/title-44-militia/44-848·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

ARTICLE 48. Contempt.
A. Authority to punish.
1. With respect to any proceeding under the Oklahoma Uniform Code of Military Justice, a judicial officer specified in paragraph 2 of this subsection may punish for contempt any person who:
a. uses any menacing word, sign, or gesture in the
presence of the judicial officer during the
proceeding,
b. disturbs the proceeding by any riot or disorder, or
c. willfully disobeys a lawful writ, process, order,
rule, decree, or command issued with respect to the
proceeding.
2. A judicial officer referred to in paragraph 1 of this subsection is any of the following:
a. any military trial judge detailed to a court-martial,
b. any military magistrate detailed or retained to
conduct prereferral proceedings under subsection D of
Section 806B of this title (Article 6B, subsection D)
or subparagraph a of paragraph 1 of subsection A of
Section 17 of this act (Article 30A, subsection A,
paragraph 1, subparagraph a) or appellate proceedings
under paragraph 3 of subsection J of Section 866 of
this title (Article 66, subsection J, paragraph 3),
c. the chief judge of the Military Court of Appeals, or
d. the president of a court of inquiry.
B. Opportunity to be heard and warning. A judicial officer, as specified in paragraph 2 of subsection A of this section, may punish a person cited for contempt after an opportunity to be heard has been given. Censure shall be imposed by the judicial officer only if:
1. It is clear from the identity of the offender and the character of his or her acts that disruptive conduct is willfully contemptuous; or
2. The conduct warranting the sanction is preceded by a clear warning that the conduct is impermissible and that specified sanctions may be imposed for its repetition.
C. Notification of contempt proceedings. The judicial officer, as specified in paragraph 2 of subsection A of this section, as soon as practicable after he or she is satisfied that courtroom misconduct requires contempt proceedings, should inform the alleged offender of his or her intention to institute said proceedings.
D. Notice and opportunity to provide evidence or testimony. Before imposing any punishment for contempt, the judicial officer shall give the offender notice of the charges and an opportunity to adduce evidence or argument relevant to guilt or punishment.
E. Imposition of sanctions. The judicial officer before whom the misconduct occurs may impose appropriate sanctions including punishment for contempt.
F. Punishment. The punishment for contempt under subsection A of this section shall not exceed the punishments provided in subsection A of Section 566 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes.
G. Review. A punishment under this section:
1. If imposed by a military trial judge, may be reviewed by the Military Court of Appeals in accordance with the uniform rules of procedure for the Military Court of Appeals under subsection L of Section 866 of this title (Article 66, subsection L);
2. If imposed by the chief judge of the Military Court of Appeals, shall constitute a judgment of the court, subject to review under the applicable provisions of Section 867 of this title (Article 67); and
3. If imposed by a court of inquiry, shall be subject to review by the convening authority in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Adjutant General. Added by Laws 2019, c. 408, § 55, eff. Oct. 1, 2019. Amended by Laws 2021, c. 12, § 19, emerg. eff. April 13, 2021.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.