Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Oklahoma · Title 12A — Uniform Commercial Code

§12A-3-309. Enforcement of Lost, Destroyed, or Stolen Instrument.

307 words·~1 min read·/ok/title-12a-uniform-commercial-code/12a-3-309·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

ENFORCEMENT OF LOST, DESTROYED, OR STOLEN INSTRUMENT
(a)A person not in possession of an instrument is entitled to enforce the instrument if:
(1)the person seeking to enforce the instrument:
(A)was entitled to enforce the instrument when loss
of possession occurred; or
(B)has directly or indirectly acquired ownership of
the instrument from a person who was entitled to
enforce the instrument when loss of possession
occurred;
(2)the loss of possession was not the result of a
transfer by the person or a lawful seizure; and
(3)the person cannot reasonably obtain possession of the
instrument because the instrument was destroyed, its
whereabouts cannot be determined, or it is in the
wrongful possession of an unknown person or a person
that cannot be found or is not amenable to service of
process.
(b)A person seeking enforcement of an instrument under subsection
(a)of this section must prove the terms of the instrument and the person's right to enforce the instrument. If that proof is made, Section 3-308 of this title applies to the case as if the person seeking enforcement had produced the instrument. The court may not enter judgment in favor of the person seeking enforcement unless it finds that the person required to pay the instrument is adequately protected against loss that might occur by reason of a claim by another person to enforce the instrument. Adequate protection may be provided by any reasonable means. Added by Laws 1991, c. 117, § 60, eff. Jan. 1, 1992. Amended by Laws 2009, c. 208, § 7, eff. Nov. 1, 2009. NOTE: Laws 2008, c. 382, § 7 was held unconstitutional by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of Weddington v. Henry, 202 P.3d 143, 2008 OK 102
(2009)and repealed by Laws 2009, c. 208, § 22, eff. Nov. 1, 2009.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.