Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · New York · Environmental Conservation · Water Pollution Control · Procedure

§ 17-0909. Review by courts.

493 words·~2 min read·/ny/environmental-conservation/water-pollution-control/procedure/17-0909·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§ 17-0909. Review by courts.
1. The provisions of this section shall apply only to titles 1 to 11,
inclusive, and title 19 of this article.
2. All orders or determinations of the commissioner or the department
shall be subject to review as provided in article 78 of the Civil
Practice Law and Rules. Application for such review must be made within
sixty days after service in person or by mail of a copy of the
determination, or decision upon the attorney of record of the applicant
and of each person who has filed a notice of appearance, or to the
applicant in person directly if not represented by an attorney.
3. Where a review as provided by article 78 of the Civil Practice Law
and Rules is not maintainable, either because the person aggrieved was
not a party to the original proceedings, or for any other reason, an
order or determination of the former water pollution control board, the
former water resources commission, the department or the commissioner
may nevertheless be reviewed as hereinafter provided:
a. Application for relief shall be made by special proceeding. The
petition shall be verified and shall set forth that the classification
of waters, standards of quality and purity thereof, or the finding,
determination, decision or order sought to be reviewed is illegal, in
whole or in part, and specify the grounds of the illegality; it may be
accompanied by affidavits and other written proof, and shall demand the
relief to which the petitioner supposes himself entitled, in the
alternative or otherwise. Such petition may be made by any person or
persons jointly or severally aggrieved by a denial or revocation of a
permit or by any decision of the former Water Pollution Control Board,
the former Water Resources Commission, the department, or the
commissioner or any act of the executive secretary or other agent or
person acting in the name of such board, commission, department, or the
commissioner whether or not such petitioner is or was a party to the
proceedings sought to be reviewed.
b. A proceeding brought under the provisions of this subdivision must
be instituted by service of the petition and notices of application for
relief, within four months after publication as herein provided of the
classification of waters or the standards of purity and quality of
waters, or after the finding, determination, decision or order sought to
be reviewed becomes final and binding upon the petitioner or the person
whom he represents, either in law or in fact; or with the court's
permission within two years, where the petitioner or the person whom he
represents, at the time such determination became final and binding upon
him, was under the age of twenty-one years, or mentally ill, or
imprisoned on a criminal charge or sentenced for a term of less than
life.
c. In all other respects the procedure prescribed in subdivision 2
shall be applicable to a review provided by this subdivision.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.