Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · New Mexico · Chapter 41 — Torts · Article 5 — Medical Malpractice Act

41-5-17. Panel selection.

376 words·~2 min read·/nm/chapter-41-torts/article-5-medical-malpractice-act/41-5-17·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

A. Applications for review shall be promptly transmitted by the director of the New Mexico medical review commission to the directors of the independent provider's state professional society or association and the state bar association, who shall each select three panelists within thirty days from the date of transmittal of the application.
B. If no state professional society or association exists or if the independent provider does not belong to a society or association, the director shall transmit the application to the independent provider's state licensing board, which shall in turn select three persons from the independent provider's profession and, where applicable, two persons specializing in the same field or discipline as the independent provider.
C. In cases where there are multiple defendants, a single combined panel shall review the claims against all party defendants. At the discretion of the panel chair, a hearing involving multiple defendants may include fewer than three panelists from the independent provider's profession and fewer than three lawyer panel members per defendant.
D. Except for cases involving multiple defendants, three panel members from the independent provider's profession and three panel members from the state bar association shall sit in review in each case.
E. The director of the medical review commission or the director's delegate, who shall be an attorney, shall sit on each panel and serve as chair.
F. A member shall disqualify the member's self from consideration of a case in which, by virtue of circumstances, the member feels the member's presence on the panel would be inappropriate, considering the purpose of the panel. The director may excuse a proposed panelist from serving.
G. Whenever a party makes and files an affidavit that a panel member selected pursuant to this section cannot, according to the belief of the party making the affidavit, sit in review of the application with impartiality, that panel member shall proceed no further. Another panel member shall be selected by the independent provider's professional association, state licensing board or the state bar association, as the case may be. A party may not disqualify more than three proposed panel members in this manner in any single malpractice claim.
History: 1953 Comp., § 58-33-17, enacted by Laws 1976, ch. 2, § 17; 2021, ch. 16, § 10.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.