Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · New Jersey · Title 48 — Partnerships · Chapter 13A

48:13A-7.31. Contested case proceedings

491 words·~2 min read·/nj/title-48/chapter-13a/48-13a-7-31·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

8. a. Whenever, on the basis of available information, the department has reasonable grounds for belief that the solid waste disposal rates collected by a privately-owned sanitary landfill facility are not in compliance with the market-based rates authorized in subsection a. of section 7 of P.L.2003, c.169 (C.48:13A-7.30), the department may initiate contested case proceedings before the Office of Administrative Law as authorized herein.
b. At least 30 days prior to transmittal of the contested case to the Office of Administrative Law pursuant to subsection a. of this section, the department shall serve a notice on the owner or operator of the affected facility. The notice shall identify the solid waste disposal rate or rates at issue, describe and attach copies of the evidence relied upon, and afford the owner or operator an opportunity to be heard on why further action on the matter is not warranted.
c. Within 30 days of the close of the hearing before the Office of Administrative Law, the administrative law judge shall issue an initial decision which may recommend that the department order the owner or operator of the affected facility to adjust the solid waste disposal rates collected by the privately-owned sanitary landfill facility to bring the rates into compliance with the market-based rates authorized in subsection a. of section 7 of P.L.2003, c.169 (C.48:13A-7.30), if the department shows that the solid waste disposal rates identified in the notice of transmittal:
(1)are not in compliance with the market-based rates authorized in subsection a. of section 7 of P.L.2003, c.169 (C.48:13A-7.30) and the owner or operator of the affected facility has not demonstrated that the rates;
(2)are designed to stabilize incoming waste flows; or
(3)are needed to meet the revenue requirements of the privately-owned sanitary landfill facility.
d. The administrative law judge's initial decision shall be simultaneously served on the department and the owner or operator of the affected facility. Within 30 days of receipt of the initial decision, the department shall issue a final order affirming or rejecting the recommendations of the administrative law judge and describing with specificity the basis in the record for any findings or conclusions which are contrary to those set forth in the initial decision.
e. If the department fails to act on the initial decision within 90 days of its receipt, or within any extended period agreed to, in writing, by the owner or operator of the affected facility, the recommendations of the administrative law judge shall be deemed affirmed and the final agency decision in the case for the purposes of appeal. Any order on the initial decision issued by the department thereafter shall be of no effect.
f. Except to the extent expressly modified herein, the contested case proceeding authorized pursuant to this section shall be conducted in accordance with the rules and regulations applicable to such proceedings promulgated by the Office of Administrative Law, including rules applicable to summary judgment motions.
L.2003,c.169,s.8.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.