Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · New Jersey · Title 17 — Notice and Publication · Chapter 27A

17:27A-8. Injunctions; prohibitions against voting securities, sequestration of voting securities

534 words·~2 min read·/nj/title-17/chapter-27a/17-27a-8·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

8. Injunctions; prohibitions against voting securities, sequestration of voting securities.
a. Injunctions. Whenever it appears to the commissioner that any person or any director, officer, employee or agent thereof has committed or is about to commit a violation of this chapter or of any rule, regulation, or order issued by the commissioner hereunder, the commissioner may apply to the Superior Court for an order enjoining such person or such director, officer, employee or agent thereof from violating or continuing to violate this chapter or any such rule, regulation or order, and for such other equitable relief as the nature of the case and the interests of the insurer's policyholders, creditors and shareholders or the public may require.
b. Voting of securities; when prohibited. No security or proxy which is the subject of any agreement, arrangement, or understanding regarding acquisition, or which is acquired or to be acquired, in contravention of the provisions of this chapter or of any rule, regulation or order issued by the commissioner hereunder may be voted at any shareholders' meeting, or may be counted for quorum purposes, and any action of shareholders requiring the affirmative vote of a percentage of shares may be taken as though such securities, including securities that may be voted pursuant to those proxies, were not issued and outstanding; but no action taken at any such meeting shall be invalidated by the voting of such securities, unless the action would materially affect control of the insurer or unless the courts of this State have so ordered.
If an insurer or the commissioner has reason to believe that any security or proxy of the insurer or other person controlling the insurer has been or is about to be acquired in contravention of the provisions of this chapter or of any rule, regulation or order issued by the commissioner hereunder the insurer or the commissioner may apply to the Superior Court to enjoin any offer, request, invitation, agreement or acquisition made in contravention of section 2 of P.L.1970, c.22 (C.17:27A-2) or any rule, regulation, or order issued by the commissioner thereunder to enjoin the voting of any security or proxy so acquired, to void any vote of such security or proxy already cast at any meeting of shareholders, and for such other equitable relief as the nature of the case and the interests of the insurer's policyholders, creditors and shareholders or the public may require.
c. Sequestration of voting securities. In any case where a person has acquired or is proposing to acquire any voting securities or proxies in violation of this chapter or any rule, regulation or order issued by the commissioner hereunder, the Superior Court may, on such notice as the court deems appropriate, upon the application of the insurer or the commissioner seize or sequester any voting securities or proxies of the insurer owned directly or indirectly by such person, and issue such orders with respect thereto as may be appropriate to effectuate the provisions of this chapter.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, for the purposes of this chapter the situs of the ownership of the securities of domestic insurers shall be deemed to be in this State.
L.1970,c.22,s.8; amended 1995,c.338,s.4; 2021, c.485, s.3.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.