Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Nebraska · Chapter 31 — Drainage

31-101. Ditches; drains; watercourses; county board; powers.

404 words·~2 min read·/ne/chapter-31/31-101

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The county board of any county may, at any regular or special session, cause to be located and constructed, straightened, widened, altered, or deepened, any ditch, drain or watercourse, as hereinafter provided, when the same is necessary to drain any lots, lands, public or corporate road, or railroad, and will be conducive to the public health, convenience or welfare.
1. Powers of county and county officers
2. Procedure
3. Miscellaneous
1. Powers of county and county officers
Void special assessment may be recovered from county. McClary v. County of Dodge, 176 Neb. 627, 126 N.W.2d 849 (1964).
County surveyor laying out drainage ditches and county commissioners in executing drainage contract under this article do not act as agents of the county, and there is no statutory provision making county liable for their neglect. Thompson v. Colfax County, 106 Neb. 351, 183 N.W. 571 (1921).
County board has authority to employ an engineer to survey and report upon location of drainage ditch. Holmvig v. Dakota County, 90 Neb. 576, 134 N.W. 166 (1912).
Before the amendment of 1911, county had no power to drain overflow lands. Campbell v. Youngson, 80 Neb. 322, 114 N.W. 415 (1907).
2. Procedure
Mode of procedure outlined in this article must be strictly followed. Shanahan v. Johnson, 170 Neb. 399, 102 N.W.2d 858 (1960).
Injunction lies to prevent construction of ditch under this article which floods lower riparian owners, until notice of time for hearing on damages is fixed. Costello v. Colfax County, 112 Neb. 40, 198 N.W. 357 (1924).
One whose land is traversed by a drainage ditch is entitled to recover the value of the land actually taken, together with any special damages to the remainder of the land caused by the construction of the improvement. Gutschow v. Washington County, 81 Neb. 275, 116 N.W. 46 (1908).
Chapter is constitutional, and provides due process of law. Morris v. Washington County, 72 Neb. 174, 100 N.W. 144 (1904); Dodge County v. Acom, 61 Neb. 376, 85 N.W. 292 (1901).
Mandamus will not lie to compel board to proceed, unless relator shows special interest. Van Horn v. State ex rel. Allen, 51 Neb. 232, 70 N.W. 941 (1897).
3. Miscellaneous
Original drain involved was constructed under this article. Harms v. County Board of Supervisors, 173 Neb. 687, 114 N.W.2d 713 (1962).
This act was not amended by sanitary district act. Whedon v. Wells, 95 Neb. 517, 145 N.W. 1007 (1914).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.