Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Nebraska · Chapter 27 — Courts; Rules of Evidence

27-615. Rule 615. Exclusion of witnesses; exceptions.

399 words·~2 min read·/ne/chapter-27/27-615

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

At the request of a party the judge shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses, and he may make the order on his own motion. This rule does not authorize exclusion of
(1)a party who is a natural person, or
(2)an officer or employee of a party which is not a natural person designated as its representative by its attorney, or
(3)a person whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of his cause.
It is permissible for a law enforcement officer, who will also be called to testify, to be present during a trial, even where a sequestration order has been entered. State v. Freeman, 267 Neb. 737, 677 N.W.2d 164 (2004).
In an attorney disciplinary proceeding, the attorney's client who was also the complaining witness in the proceeding was an essential witness under subsection
(3)of this section. State ex rel. NSBA v. Miller, 258 Neb. 181, 602 N.W.2d 486 (1999).
Sequestration order not violated by presence of State's psychiatrist who was not to be called as a witness at trial. State v. Ryan, 233 Neb. 74, 444 N.W.2d 610 (1989).
A psychiatrist or psychologist may be present in the courtroom in contravention of a sequestration order upon a showing that his or her presence is essential to the presentation of a party's case. State v. Jackson, 231 Neb. 207, 435 N.W.2d 893 (1989).
Defendant's request to sequester a witness who was the prosecutrix and victim, held properly denied under exception in subsection
(3)hereof. State v. Eynon, 197 Neb. 734, 250 N.W.2d 658 (1977).
This section does not require a party to present evidence in order to show that a witness is essential. In re Interest of Gabriel B., 31 Neb. App. 21, 976 N.W.2d 206 (2022).
This section does not require that the witness have no other way to obtain the information needed except to be present in the courtroom. In re Interest of Gabriel B., 31 Neb. App. 21, 976 N.W.2d 206 (2022).
The general rule is that witnesses shall be excluded from a proceeding at the request of a party; this rule has certain exceptions, including a person whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of its cause. In re Interest of Dennis W., 14 Neb. App. 827, 717 N.W.2d 488 (2006).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.