25-1031.01. Garnishment; judgment; effect.
90 words·~1 min read·
/ne/chapter-25/25-1031-01A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
The judgment in the garnishment action shall be conclusive between the garnishee, plaintiff, defendant, and any intervenor.
A specific holding, in a prior garnishment action by a creditor against a bank's insurer under a blanket employee dishonesty bond, that the bank did not suffer a loss within the coverage of such bond is res judicata in a subsequent suit brought by the bank to recover under the bond and cannot be relitigated. Bank of Mead v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 202 Neb. 403, 275 N.W.2d 822 (1979).