21-1977. Removal of directors by judicial proceeding.
259 words·~1 min read·
/ne/chapter-21/21-1977A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)The district court of the county where a corporation's principal office (or, if none in this state, its registered office) is located may remove any director of the corporation from office in a proceeding commenced either by the corporation, its members holding at least ten percent of the voting power of any class, or the Attorney General in the case of a public benefit corporation, if it finds that (1)(i) the director engaged in fraudulent or dishonest conduct,
(ii)the director engaged in a gross abuse of authority or discretion, with respect to the corporation, or
(iii)a final judgment has been entered finding that the director has violated a duty set forth in sections 21-1986 to 21-1989 and
(2)removal is in the best interest of the corporation.
(b)The district court may bar the removed director from serving on the board for a period prescribed by the court.
(c)If members or the Attorney General commence a proceeding under subsection
(a)of this section the corporation shall be made a party defendant.
(d)If a public benefit corporation or its members commence a proceeding under subsection
(a)of this section, they shall give the Attorney General written notice of the proceeding.
(e)The articles or bylaws of a religious corporation may limit or prohibit the application of this section.
Effective notice to the Attorney General is an essential prerequisite to proceeding in any action involving a public benefit corporation for which such notice is required. Hitchcock Foundation v. Kountze, 272 Neb. 251, 720 N.W.2d 31 (2006).