Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · North Carolina · Chapter 90 — Medicine and Allied Occupations

§ 90-113.74D. Dispenser use of controlled substances reporting system.

284 words·~1 min read·/nc/chapter-90/90-113-74d

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§ 90-113.74D. Dispenser use of controlled substances reporting system.
(a)Prior to dispensing a targeted controlled substance, a dispenser shall review the information in the controlled substances reporting system pertaining to the patient for the preceding 12-month period and document this review under any of the following circumstances:
(1)The dispenser has a reasonable belief that the ultimate user may be seeking a targeted controlled substance for any reason other than the treatment of the ultimate user's existing medical condition.
(2)The prescriber is located outside of the usual geographic area served by the dispenser.
(3)The ultimate user resides outside of the usual geographic area served by the dispenser.
(4)The ultimate user pays for the prescription with cash when the patient has prescription insurance on file with the dispenser.
(5)The ultimate user demonstrates potential misuse of a controlled substance by any one or more of the following:
a. Over-utilization of the controlled substance.
b. Requests for early refills.
c. Utilization of multiple prescribers.
d. An appearance of being overly sedated or intoxicated upon presenting a prescription.
e. A request by an unfamiliar ultimate user for an opioid drug by a specific name, street name, color, or identifying marks.
(b)If a dispenser has reason to believe a prescription for a targeted controlled substance is fraudulent or duplicative, the dispenser shall withhold delivery of the prescription until the dispenser is able to contact the prescriber and verify that the prescription is medically appropriate.
(c)A dispenser shall be immune from any civil or criminal liability for actions authorized by this section. Failure to review the system in accordance with subsection
(a)of this section shall not constitute medical negligence. (2017-74, s. 12.)
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.