Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Montana · Title 76 — Land Resources and Use · Chapter 25 · Part 5

76-25-503. Appeals -- public hearing and notice.

588 words·~3 min read·/mt/title-76/chapter-25/part-5/76-25-503·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

76-25-503 . Appeals -- public hearing and notice.
(1)Appeals of any final decisions made pursuant to this chapter must be made in accordance with this section.
(2)For a challenge to the adoption of or amendment to a land use plan, zoning regulation, zoning map, or subdivision regulation, a petition setting forth the basis for the challenge must be presented to the district court within 30 days of the date of the resolution or ordinance adopted by the governing body.
(a)Any final administrative land use decision, including but not limited to approval or denial of a zoning permit, preliminary plat or final plat, imposition of a condition on a zoning permit or plat, approval or denial of a variance from a zoning or subdivision regulation, or interpretation of land use regulations or map may be appealed by the applicant or any aggrieved person to the planning commission.
(b)An appeal under subsection (3)(a) must be submitted in writing within 15 business days of the challenged decision, stating the facts and raising all grounds for appeal that the party may raise in district court.
(i)The planning commission shall hold a public hearing to hear the appeal de novo. The planning commission is not bound by the decision that has been appealed, but the appeal must be limited to the issues raised on appeal. The appellant has the burden of proving that the appealed decision was made in error.
(ii)Notice of the appeal must be published as provided in 7-1-2121 or 7-1-4127 , as applicable.
(d)A decision of the planning commission on appeal takes effect on the date when the planning commission issues a written decision.
(a)Any final land use decision by the planning commission may be appealed by the applicant, planning administrator, or any aggrieved person to the governing body.
(b)An appeal under subsection (4)(a) must be submitted in writing within 15 business days of the challenged decision, stating the facts and raising all grounds for appeal that the party may raise in district court.
(i)The governing body shall hold a public hearing to hear the appeal de novo. The governing body is not bound by the decision that has been appealed, but the appeal must be limited to the issues raised on appeal. The appellant has the burden of proving that the appealed decision was made in error.
(ii)Notice of the appeal must be published as provided in 7-1-2121 or 7-1-4127 , as applicable.
(d)A decision of the governing body on appeal takes effect on the date when the governing body issues a written decision.
(a)No person may challenge in district court a land use decision until that person has exhausted the person's administrative appeal process as provided in this section.
(b)Any final land use decision of the governing body may be challenged by presenting a petition setting forth the grounds for review of a final land use decision with the district court within 30 calendar days after the written decision is issued.
(c)A challenge in district court to a final land use decision of the governing body is limited to the issues raised by the challenger on administrative appeal.
(6)Every final land use decision made pursuant to this section must be based on the administrative record as a whole and must be sustained unless the decision being challenged is arbitrary, capricious, or unlawful.
(7)Nothing in this chapter is subject to any provision of Title 2, chapter 4.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.