Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Montana · Title 76 — Land Resources and Use · Chapter 15 · Part 5

76-15-545. Criteria for evaluation of loan applicants -- preferences.

183 words·~1 min read·/mt/title-76/chapter-15/part-5/76-15-545·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

76-15-545 . Criteria for evaluation of loan applicants -- preferences.
(1)The district supervisors shall apply the following criteria in ranking applications for a conservation practice loan that is eligible for funding under 76-15-544 :
(a)the extent and desirability of the conservation need and resource benefit as determined in the district's annual and long-range plans;
(b)the feasibility and practicality of the project;
(c)the number of related resources that will benefit, including but not limited to water quality, wildlife habitat, and recreation;
(d)the extent and desirability of associated public benefits in addition to any private benefits the project or activity may provide; and
(e)any other factor that, in the district supervisors' judgment, is important to the evaluation of the conservation practice in light of the purposes, policies, and objectives of this chapter.
(2)Among applications for a loan in which the proposed conservation practices are substantially equal in ranking under subsection (1), a district shall give preference to:
(a)applicants who have not previously received a conservation practice loan; and
(b)applications for a group or cooperative conservation practice.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.