Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Montana · Title 23 — Parks, Recreation, Sports, and Gambling · Chapter 5 · Part 1

23-5-183. Rebuttable presumption of forfeiture -- rebuttal of presumption.

223 words·~1 min read·/mt/title-23/chapter-5/part-1/23-5-183·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

23-5-183 . Rebuttable presumption of forfeiture -- rebuttal of presumption.
(1)There is a rebuttable presumption of forfeiture.
(2)An owner of the personal property who has a verified answer on file may rebut the presumption by proving that the property was not used for the purpose charged or that the use of the property occurred without the owner's knowledge or consent.
(3)A claimant of a security interest in the personal property who has a verified answer on file may preserve the security interest by proving that the security interest:
(a)is bona fide; and
(b)was created after a reasonable investigation of the moral responsibility, character, and reputation of the purchaser of the personal property and without knowledge that the personal property was going to be or was used for the purpose charged.
(4)Subsection (3)(b) does not apply to:
(a)a person who has a lien for making repairs or performing labor upon, furnishing supplies or materials for, or providing storage for or safekeeping of the personal property;
(b)a person doing business under any law of this state or the United States relating to financial institutions, as defined in 32-6-103 , loan companies, or licensed pawnbrokers; or
(c)a person regularly engaged in the business of selling or of purchasing conditional sales contracts for that type of personal property.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.