Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Montana · Title 22 — Libraries, Arts, and Antiquities · Chapter 3 · Part 9

22-3-916. Board decision -- order -- immunity against aggrieved parties -- relinquishment of control by tribal group.

279 words·~1 min read·/mt/title-22/chapter-3/part-9/22-3-916·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

22-3-916 . Board decision -- order -- immunity against aggrieved parties -- relinquishment of control by tribal group.
(1)Subject to the provisions of 2-4-621 and 2-4-623 , at the conclusion of the hearing and upon receipt of the recommendations of the hearings examiner, the board shall:
(a)issue findings of facts and conclusions related to any decision regarding its determination supporting or denying a claimant's written request for the repatriation of human skeletal remains or funerary objects;
(b)issue findings of facts and conclusions related to any decision regarding a possessing entity's or intervenor's request for a temporary delay in repatriation pending completion of ongoing scientific study; and
(c)provide the claimant, respondent, possessing entity, or intervenor with a written copy of its findings and conclusions regarding the specific repatriation request.
(2)A possessing entity that repatriates culturally affiliated human skeletal remains or funerary objects in good faith pursuant to this section is not liable for claims by an aggrieved party or for claims of breach of a fiduciary duty or the public trust or of violation of state law that are inconsistent with this part.
(3)This section does not prevent the governing body of a tribal group from expressly relinquishing control over any human skeletal remains or control or title to any funerary object. The acquisition of a funerary object from a tribal group or individual with the voluntary consent of the tribal group or individual with authority to alienate the object constitutes the right of possession over that object. Divestiture of culturally affiliated human skeletal remains or funerary objects from a person without a right of possession does not constitute an unconstitutional taking of property.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.