Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Mississippi · Title 95. Torts · Chapter 5. Trespass

§ 95-5-31. Duty of possessor of real property to trespasser.

349 words·~2 min read·/ms/title-95-torts/chapter-5-trespass/95-5-31·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

For the purposes of this section, the following words shall have the following meanings:
“Possessor of real property” means any person with a fee, reversionary, or easement interest in real property, including an owner, lessee, or other lawful occupant.
“Trespasser” means a person who enters upon the property of another without permission and without an invitation, express or implied, or other legal right.
A possessor of real property owes no duty of care to a trespasser, except a duty to refrain from willfully or wantonly injuring such a person.
Notwithstanding subsection
(2)of this section, a possessor of real property may be subject to liability for injury to a trespasser if:
The possessor discovers the trespasser in a position of peril on the property and fails to exercise reasonable care to prevent injury to that trespasser; or
The trespasser is a child injured by an artificial condition on the possessor’s property and all of the following apply:
The place where the condition existed was one upon which the possessor knew or had reason to know that a child would be likely to trespass;
The condition is one of which the possessor knew or had reason to know and which the possessor realized or should have realized would involve an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm to a child;
The injured child because of his or her youth did not discover the condition or realize the risk involved in intermeddling with it or in coming within the area made dangerous by it;
The utility to the possessor of maintaining the condition and the burden of eliminating the danger was slight as compared with the risk to the child; and
The possessor failed to exercise reasonable care to eliminate the danger or otherwise to protect the child.
This section does not create or increase the liability of any possessor of real property and does not affect any immunities from or defenses to civil liability established by another section of the Mississippi Code of 1972 or available at common law to which a possessor of real property may be entitled.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.