Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Missouri · Chapter 362

362.1110. Principal place of business — retention of records — in camera inspection, when.

378 words·~2 min read·/mo/chapter-362/362-1110

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

362.1110. Principal place of business — retention of records — in camera inspection, when. — 1. A family trust company shall keep at its principal place of business or principal place of operations:
(1)Full and complete records of the names and residences of all its shareholders or members;
(2)The number of shares or membership units held by each, as applicable; and
(3)The ownership percentage of each shareholder or member.
­­
­
The records are subject to inspection by all shareholders or members of the family trust company and the director or the director's authorized representative during the normal business hours of the family trust company. A current list of shareholders or members shall be made available to the director or the director's authorized representative for their inspection and, upon the request of the director, shall be submitted to the director.
2. The director shall retain for at least ten years:
(1)Examination reports;
(2)Investigatory records;
(3)The organizational instrument of a family trust company; and
(4)The annual registration reports filed by a family trust company.
3. A copy of any document on file with the director that is certified by the director as a true copy may be introduced in evidence as if it were the original. The director shall establish a schedule of fees for preparing true copies of documents.
4. Orders issued by courts or administrative law judges for the production of confidential records or information shall provide for inspection in camera by the court or the administrative law judge. If the court or administrative law judge determines that the documents requested are relevant or would likely lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, the documents shall be subject to further orders by the court or the administrative law judge to protect the confidentiality thereof.
An order directing the release of information shall be immediately reviewable, and a petition by the director for review of the order shall automatically stay any further proceedings in a trial court or administrative hearing until the disposition of the petition by the reviewing court. If any other party files a petition for review, such filing shall stay proceedings only upon an order of the reviewing court.
­­--------
(L. 2017 H.B. 292, A.L. 2024 S.B. 1359)
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.