Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Missouri · Chapter 169

169.572. Dissolution of marriage, court not to divide retirement benefits or Social Security benefits.

213 words·~1 min read·/mo/chapter-169/169-572

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

169.572. Dissolution of marriage, court not to divide retirement benefits or Social Security benefits. — 1. No court shall divide or set aside any federal old-age, survivors or disability insurance benefit provided to any party pursuant to the federal Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 200 et seq., in any proceeding for dissolution of marriage.
2. Subsequent to August 28, 1991, a court of competent jurisdiction may divide the pension, annuity, benefits, rights, and retirement allowance provided pursuant to this chapter between the parties to any action for dissolution of marriage, to the same extent and in the same manner the court may divide any federal old-age, survivors or disability insurance benefit of the parties provided pursuant to the federal Social Security Act.
­­--------
(L. 1989 H.B. 610 § 2, A.L. 1991 S.B. 242, et al. § 169.142)
(1993)Where statute provides that public school teacher's pension benefits may be divided in action for dissolution of marriage to same extent as Social Security benefits, public school teacher's pension benefits are not marital property. Kieninger v. Catlett, 854 S.W.2d 59 (Mo. App. W.D.)
(2003)Provision that public school retirement system benefits are non-divisible, nonmarital property does not violate substantive due process or equal protection rights. In re Marriage of Woodson, 92 S.W.3d 780 (Mo.banc).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.