Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Missouri · Chapter 130

130.054. Complaint, filing procedure, when — ethics commission to investigate, procedure — limitation on accepting complaints.

528 words·~2 min read·/mo/chapter-130/130-054

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

130.054. Complaint, filing procedure, when — ethics commission to investigate, procedure — limitation on accepting complaints. — 1. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 3 of section 105.957 , any natural person may file a complaint with the Missouri ethics commission alleging failure to timely or accurately file a personal financial disclosure statement, a campaign finance disclosure report or a violation of the provisions of this chapter by any candidate for elective office, within sixty days prior to the primary election at which such candidate is running for office, until after the general election.
Any such complaint shall be in writing, shall state all facts known by the complainant which have given rise to the complaint, and shall be sworn to, under penalty of perjury, by the complainant.
2. Within the first business day after receipt of a complaint pursuant to this section, the executive director shall supply a copy of the complaint to the person or entity named in the complaint, deleting any material identifying the name of the complainant. The executive director shall notify the complainant and the person or entity named in the complaint of the date and time at which the commission shall audit and investigate the allegations contained in the complaint pursuant to subsection 3 of this section.
3. Within fifteen business days of receipt of a complaint pursuant to this section, the commission shall audit and investigate the allegations contained in the complaint and shall determine by a vote of at least four members of the commission that there are reasonable grounds to believe that a violation of law has occurred within the jurisdiction of the commission. The respondent may reply in writing or in person to the allegations contained in the complaint and may state justifications to dismiss the complaint.
The complainant may also present evidence in support of the allegations contained in the complaint, but such evidence shall be limited in scope to the allegations contained in the original complaint, and such complaint may not be supplemented or otherwise enlarged in scope.
4. If, after audit and investigation of the complaint and upon a vote of at least four members of the commission, the commission determines that there are reasonable grounds to believe that a violation of law has occurred within the jurisdiction of the commission, the commission shall proceed with such complaint as provided by sections 105.957 to 105.963 . If the commission does not determine that there are reasonable grounds to believe that such a violation of law has occurred, the complaint shall be dismissed.
If a complaint is dismissed, the fact that such complaint was dismissed, with a statement of the nature of the complaint, shall be made public within twenty-four hours of the commission's action.
5. Any complaint made pursuant to this section, and all proceedings and actions concerning such a complaint, shall be subject to the provisions of subsection 15 of section 105.961 .
6. No complaint shall be accepted by the commission within fifteen days prior to the primary or general election at which such candidate is running for office.
­­--------
(L. 1994 S.B. 650, A.L. 1997 S.B. 16, A.L. 2006 H.B. 1900)
Effective 1-01-07
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.