Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Minnesota · Chapter 62

62S.26 LOSS RATIO.

542 words·~2 min read·/mn/chapter-62/62s-26

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

62S.26 LOSS RATIO.
§
Subdivision 1. Minimum loss ratio.
The minimum loss ratio must be at least 60 percent, calculated in a manner which provides for adequate reserving of the long-term care insurance risk. In evaluating the expected loss ratio, the commissioner shall give consideration to all relevant factors, including:
(1)statistical credibility of incurred claims experience and earned premiums;
(2)the period for which rates are computed to provide coverage;
(3)experienced and projected trends;
(4)concentration of experience within early policy duration;
(5)expected claim fluctuation;
(6)experience refunds, adjustments, or dividends;
(7)renewability features;
(8)all appropriate expense factors;
(9)interest;
(10)experimental nature of the coverage;
(11)policy reserves;
(12)mix of business by risk classification; and
(13)product features such as long elimination periods, high deductibles, and high maximum limits.
§
Subd. 2. Life insurance policies.
Subdivision 1 shall not apply to life insurance policies that accelerate benefits for long-term care. A life insurance policy that funds long-term care benefits entirely by accelerating the death benefit is considered to provide reasonable benefits in relation to premiums paid, if the policy complies with all of the following provisions:
(1)the interest credited internally to determine cash value accumulations, including long-term care, if any, are guaranteed not to be less than the minimum guaranteed interest rate for cash value accumulations without long-term care set forth in the policy;
(2)the portion of the policy that provides life insurance benefits meets the nonforfeiture requirements of section 61A.24 ;
(3)the policy meets the disclosure requirements of sections 62S.09 , 62S.10 , and 62S.11 ;
(4)any policy illustration that meets the applicable requirements of the NAIC Life Insurance Illustrations Model Regulation; and
(5)an actuarial memorandum is filed with the commissioner that includes:
(i)a description of the basis on which the long-term care rates were determined;
(ii)a description of the basis for the reserves;
(iii)a summary of the type of policy, benefits, renewability, general marketing method, and limits on ages of issuance;
(iv)a description and a table of each actuarial assumption used. For expenses, an insurer must include percentage of premium dollars per policy and dollars per unit of benefits, if any;
(v)a description and a table of the anticipated policy reserves and additional reserves to be held in each future year for active lives;
(vi)the estimated average annual premium per policy and the average issue age;
(vii)a statement as to whether underwriting is performed at the time of application. The statement shall indicate whether underwriting is used and, if used, the statement shall include a description of the type or types of underwriting used, such as medical underwriting or functional assessment underwriting. Concerning a group policy, the statement shall indicate whether the enrollee or any dependent will be underwritten and when underwriting occurs; and
(viii)a description of the effect of the long-term care policy provision on the required premiums, nonforfeiture values, and reserves on the underlying life insurance policy, both for active lives and those in long-term care claim status.
§
Subd. 3. Nonapplication.
This section does not apply to policies or certificates that are subject to sections 62S.021 , 62S.081 , and 62S.265 , and that comply with those sections.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.