Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Minnesota · Chapter 62

62J.91 PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRODUCT REVIEWS.

411 words·~2 min read·/mn/chapter-62/62j-91

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

62J.91 PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRODUCT REVIEWS.
§
Subdivision 1. General.
Once a decision by the board has been made to proceed with a cost review of a prescription drug product, the board shall conduct the review and make a determination as to whether appropriate utilization of the prescription drug under review, based on utilization that is consistent with the United States Food and Drug Administration
(FDA)label or standard medical practice, has led or will lead to affordability challenges for the state health care system or for patients.
§
Subd. 2. Review considerations.
In reviewing the cost of a prescription drug product, the board may consider the following factors:
(1)the price at which the prescription drug product has been and will be sold in the state;
(2)manufacturer monetary price concessions, discounts, or rebates, and drug-specific patient assistance;
(3)the price of therapeutic alternatives;
(4)the cost to group purchasers based on patient access consistent with the FDA-labeled indications and standard medical practice;
(5)measures of patient access, including cost-sharing and other metrics;
(6)the extent to which the attorney general or a court has determined that a price increase for a generic or off-patent prescription drug product was excessive under sections 62J.842 and 62J.844 ;
(7)any information a manufacturer chooses to provide; and
(8)any other factors as determined by the board.
§
Subd. 3. Public data; proprietary information.
(a)Any submission made to the board related to a drug cost review must be made available to the public with the exception of information determined by the board to be proprietary and information provided by the commissioner of health classified as not public data under section 13.02, subdivision 8a , or as trade secret information under section 13.37, subdivision 1 , paragraph (b), or as trade secret information under the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016, United States Code, title 18, section 1836, as amended.
(b)The board shall establish the standards for the information to be considered proprietary under paragraph
(a)and section 62J.90, subdivision 2 , including standards for heightened consideration of proprietary information for submissions for a cost review of a drug that is not yet approved by the FDA.
(c)Prior to the board establishing the standards under paragraph (b), the public shall be provided notice and the opportunity to submit comments.
(d)The establishment of standards under this subdivision is exempt from the rulemaking requirements under chapter 14, and section 14.386 does not apply.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.