Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Michigan · Chapter 750 — Michigan Penal Code

750.159m Property subject to civil in rem forfeiture; exceptions; encumbrances; attorney fees.

321 words·~1 min read·/mi/chapter-750/750-159m

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

750.159m Property subject to civil in rem forfeiture; exceptions; encumbrances; attorney fees.
Sec. 159m.
(1)Except as otherwise provided in this section, all real, personal, or intangible property of a person convicted of a violation of section 159i that is the proceeds of racketeering, the substituted proceeds of racketeering, or an instrumentality of racketeering, is subject to civil in rem forfeiture to a local unit of government or the state under this section and sections 159n to 159q.
(2)Real property that is the primary residence of the spouse of the owner is not subject to civil in rem forfeiture under this section and sections 159n to 159q, unless that spouse had prior actual knowledge of, and consented to and participated in the commission of, the racketeering activity. Real property that is the primary residence of a dependent minor child of the owner is not subject to civil in rem forfeiture under this section and sections 159n to 159q.
(3)Property is not subject to civil in rem forfeiture if either of the following circumstances exists:
(a)The owner of the property did not have prior actual knowledge of the commission of the racketeering activity.
(b)The owner of the property served notice of the commission of the crime upon an appropriate law enforcement agency.
(4)The civil in rem forfeiture of property encumbered by a security interest is subject to the interest of the holder of the security interest who did not have prior actual knowledge of the racketeering activity.
(5)The civil in rem forfeiture of property encumbered by an unpaid balance on a land contract is subject to the interest of the land contract vendor who did not have prior actual knowledge of the racketeering activity.
(6)Reasonable attorney fees for representation in an action under this chapter are not subject to civil in rem forfeiture under this chapter.
History: Add. 1995, Act 187, Eff. Apr. 1, 1996
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.