Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Michigan · Chapter 600 — Revised Judicature Act of 1961

600.407 District judges, circuit and probate judges; Genesee, Ingham, Kent, Macomb, Oakland, and Washtenaw counties; adoption of plan of concurrent jurisdiction.

484 words·~2 min read·/mi/chapter-600/600-407

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

600.407 District judges, circuit and probate judges; Genesee, Ingham, Kent, Macomb, Oakland, and Washtenaw counties; adoption of plan of concurrent jurisdiction.
Sec. 407.
(1)Within the counties of Genesee, Ingham, Kent, Macomb, Oakland, and Washtenaw, a majority of all of the district judges in the county-funded district court district and the circuit judges and probate judges of the courts in the plan, subject to approval by the supreme court and to the limitations contained in sections 410, 841, and 8304, shall adopt 1 or more plans of concurrent jurisdiction under this section unless a plan of concurrent jurisdiction has been adopted under section 406 or 408, or unless a majority of all of the district judges in the county-funded district court district and the circuit judges and probate judges in that county vote not to have a plan of concurrent jurisdiction. If a majority of all of the district judges in the county-funded district court district and the circuit judges and probate judges in that county vote not to have a plan of concurrent jurisdiction, the chief judge of the circuit court in that county shall report the results of that vote to the state court administrator.
(2)A plan of concurrent jurisdiction under this section may provide for 1 or more of the following:
(a)The circuit court and 1 or more circuit judges may exercise the power and jurisdiction of the probate court.
(b)The circuit court and 1 or more circuit judges may exercise the power and jurisdiction of the district court within the county-funded district court district.
(c)The probate court and 1 or more probate judges may exercise the power and jurisdiction of the circuit court.
(d)The probate court and 1 or more probate judges may exercise the power and jurisdiction of the district court within the county-funded district court district.
(e)The district court and 1 or more district judges in the county-funded district court district within the county may exercise the power and jurisdiction of the circuit court.
(f)The district court and 1 or more district judges in the county-funded district court district within the county may exercise the power and jurisdiction of the probate court.
(3)A plan of concurrent jurisdiction under this section shall provide for the transfer or assignment of cases between the trial courts affected by the plan and to individual judges of those courts as necessary to implement the plan and to fairly distribute the workload among those judges.
(4)A plan of concurrent jurisdiction under this section may include agreements as to other matters involving the operation of the trial courts participating in the plan, as approved by the supreme court.
(5)A plan of concurrent jurisdiction becomes effective upon the approval of the plan by the supreme court.
History: Add. 2002, Act 678 , Eff. Apr. 1, 2003 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 338 , Eff. Jan. 1, 2013
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.