Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Michigan · Chapter 484 — Telephone, Telegraph, and Radio

484.2213 Rules; rescission of certain rules.

337 words·~2 min read·/mi/chapter-484/484-2213

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

484.2213 Rules; rescission of certain rules.
Sec. 213.
(1)Subject to section 201 and limited to its specific authority over a service as provided under this act, the commission may promulgate rules under the administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328.
(2)A proceeding before the commission to promulgate rules under this act shall be concluded within 180 days from the date that the proceeding is initiated.
(3)The following administrative rules are rescinded:
(a)Privacy standards for telecommunication services, R 484.201 to R 484.208 of the Michigan administrative code.
(b)Billing standards for basic residential telecommunication service, R 484.301 to R 484.386 of the Michigan administrative code.
(c)Telecommunications service quality, R 484.519 to R 484.571 of the Michigan administrative code.
History: 1991, Act 179, Eff. Jan. 1, 1992 ;-- Am. 1995, Act 216, Imd. Eff. Nov. 30, 1995 ;-- Am. 2000, Act 295 , Imd. Eff. July 17, 2000 ;-- Am. 2004, Act 591 , Imd. Eff. Jan. 4, 2005 ;-- Am. 2005, Act 235 , Imd. Eff. Nov. 22, 2005 ;-- Am. 2011, Act 58 , Imd. Eff. June 14, 2011
Compiler's Notes: In separate opinions, the Michigan Supreme Court held that Section 45(8), (9), (10), and
(12)and the second sentence of Section 46(1) (“An agency shall not file a rule ... until at least 10 days after the date of the certificate of approval by the committee or after the legislature adopts a concurrent resolution approving the rule.”) of the Administrative Procedures Act of 1969, in providing for the Legislature's reservation of authority to approve or disapprove rules proposed by executive branch agencies, did not comply with the enactment and presentment requirements of Const 1963, Art 4, and violated the separation of powers provision of Const 1963, Art 3, and, therefore, were unconstitutional. These specified portions were declared to be severable with the remaining portions remaining effective. Blank v Department of Corrections, 462 Mich 103 (2000).
Admin Rule: R 484.401 et seq. of the Michigan Administrative Code.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.