Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Michigan · Chapter 423 — Labor Disputes and Employment Relations

423.239 Findings, opinions, and orders; factors considered; financial ability of governmental unit to pay.

526 words·~2 min read·/mi/chapter-423/423-239

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

423.239 Findings, opinions, and orders; factors considered; financial ability of governmental unit to pay.
Sec. 9.
(1)If the parties have no collective bargaining agreement or the parties have an agreement and have begun negotiations or discussions looking to a new agreement or amendment of the existing agreement and wage rates or other conditions of employment under the proposed new or amended agreement are in dispute, the arbitration panel shall base its findings, opinions, and order upon the following factors:
(a)The financial ability of the unit of government to pay. All of the following shall apply to the arbitration panel's determination of the ability of the unit of government to pay:
(i)The financial impact on the community of any award made by the arbitration panel.
(ii)The interests and welfare of the public.
(iii)All liabilities, whether or not they appear on the balance sheet of the unit of government.
(iv)Any law of this state or any directive issued under the local financial stability and choice act, 2012 PA 436, MCL 141.1541 to 141.1575, that places limitations on a unit of government's expenditures or revenue collection.
(b)The lawful authority of the employer.
(c)Stipulations of the parties.
(d)Comparison of the wages, hours, and conditions of employment of the employees involved in the arbitration proceeding with the wages, hours, and conditions of employment of other employees performing similar services and with other employees generally in both of the following:
(i)Public employment in comparable communities.
(ii)Private employment in comparable communities.
(e)Comparison of the wages, hours, and conditions of employment of other employees of the unit of government outside of the bargaining unit in question.
(f)The average consumer prices for goods and services, commonly known as the cost of living.
(g)The overall compensation presently received by the employees, including direct wage compensation, vacations, holidays, and other excused time, insurance and pensions, medical and hospitalization benefits, the continuity and stability of employment, and all other benefits received.
(h)Changes in any of the foregoing circumstances while the arbitration proceedings are pending.
(i)Other factors that are normally or traditionally taken into consideration in the determination of wages, hours, and conditions of employment through voluntary collective bargaining, mediation, fact-finding, arbitration, or otherwise between the parties, in the public service, or in private employment.
(j)If applicable, a written document with supplementary information relating to the financial position of the local unit of government that is filed with the arbitration panel by a financial review commission as authorized under the Michigan financial review commission act.
(2)The arbitration panel shall give the financial ability of the unit of government to pay the most significance, if the determination is supported by competent, material, and substantial evidence.
History: 1969, Act 312, Eff. Oct. 1, 1969 ;-- Am. 2011, Act 116 , Imd. Eff. July 20, 2011 ;-- Am. 2014, Act 189 , Imd. Eff. June 20, 2014
Constitutionality: This act is clearly constitutional. Local 1277, Metropolitan Council No 23, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO v City of Center Line, 414 Mich 642; 327 NW2d 822 (1982).
Popular Name: Act 312
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.