Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Michigan · Chapter 418 — Worker's Disability Compensation

418.836 Approval of redemption agreement; findings; factors considered in making determination; employer as party.

495 words·~2 min read·/mi/chapter-418/418-836

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

418.836 Approval of redemption agreement; findings; factors considered in making determination; employer as party.
Sec. 836.
(1)A redemption agreement shall only be approved by a worker's compensation magistrate if the worker's compensation magistrate finds all of the following:
(a)That the redemption agreement serves the purpose of this act, is just and proper under the circumstances, and is in the best interests of the injured employee.
(b)That the redemption agreement is voluntarily agreed to by all parties. If an employer does not object in writing or in person to the proposed redemption agreement, the employer shall be considered to have agreed to the proposed agreement.
(c)That if an application has been filed pursuant to section 847 it alleges a compensable cause of action under this act.
(d)That the injured employee is fully aware of his or her rights under this act and the consequences of a redemption agreement.
(2)Parties may stipulate in writing to the determinations in subsection (1). If all parties stipulate in writing to those determinations, the stipulation may serve as a waiver of hearing, and the magistrate may approve the redemption agreement. A magistrate may conduct a hearing on a proposed stipulation.
(3)In making a determination under subsection (1), factors to be considered by the worker's compensation magistrate shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
(a)Any other benefits the injured employee is receiving or is entitled to receive and the effect a redemption agreement might have on those benefits.
(b)The nature and extent of the injuries and disabilities of the employee.
(c)The age and life expectancy of the injured employee.
(d)Whether the injured employee has any health, disability, or related insurance.
(e)The number of dependents of the injured employee.
(f)The marital status of the injured employee.
(g)Whether any other person may have any claim on the redemption proceeds.
(h)The amount of the injured employee's average monthly expenses.
(i)The intended use of the redemption proceeds by the injured employee.
(4)The factors considered by the worker's compensation magistrate in making a determination under this section and the responses of the injured employee thereto shall be placed on the record.
(5)An employer shall be considered a party for purposes under this section.
History: Add. 1981, Act 198, Eff. Jan. 1, 1984 ;-- Am. 1983, Act 151, Imd. Eff. July 18, 1983 ;-- Am. 1985, Act 103, Imd. Eff. July 30, 1985 ;-- Am. 1994, Act 271, Imd. Eff. July 11, 1994 ;-- Am. 2011, Act 266 , Imd. Eff. Dec. 19, 2011
Compiler's Notes: Section 2 of Act 151 of 1983 provides: “This amendatory act shall apply to proposed redemption agreements filed after December 31, 1983.”For legislative intent as to severability, see Compiler's note to MCL 418.213.Enacting section 2 of Act 266 of 2011 provides:"Enacting section 2. This amendatory act applies to injuries incurred on or after its effective date."
Popular Name: Act 317
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.