32.1058 Sentence of confinement; execution; discipline and treatment to which imprisoned individual subject; omission of words “hard labor” from sentence; duty of keeper

255 words·~1 min read·/mi/chapter-32/32-1058

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

32.1058 Sentence of confinement; execution; discipline and treatment to which imprisoned individual subject; omission of words “hard labor” from sentence; duty of keeper or officer in charge of county jail to receive or confine prisoner; proceeds of fines; costs of prosecution.

Sec. 58.

(1)A sentence of confinement issued by a court-martial may be carried into execution by confinement in a place allowed by section 10 as designated by the convening authority. An individual confined is subject to the same discipline and treatment as an individual imprisoned by a civil court of this state.

(2)The omission of the words "hard labor" from a sentence of a court-martial adjudging confinement does not deprive the authority executing that sentence of the power to require hard labor as a part of the punishment.

(3)The keeper or officer in charge of a county jail shall receive an individual ordered into confinement before trial by the convening authority and an individual sentenced to confinement by a military court and shall confine the individual according to law. A keeper or officer in charge shall not require payment of a fee or compensation for receiving or confining the prisoner.

(4)The proceeds of all fines in summary, special, and general courts-martial cases must be paid to the general fund of this state. The costs of prosecution must be paid out of the funds appropriated to the office of the adjutant general.

History: 1980, Act 523, Eff. Mar. 31, 1981 ;-- Am. 2024, Act 77 , Imd. Eff. July 8, 2024