287.529 Commercial feed considered to be misbranded.
192 words·~1 min read·
/mi/chapter-287/287-529A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
287.529 Commercial feed considered to be misbranded.
Sec. 9.
A commercial feed is considered to be misbranded and in violation of this act if any of the following occur:
(a)Its labeling is false or misleading in any particular.
(b)It is distributed under the name of another commercial feed.
(c)It is not labeled as required under section 5.
(d)It purports to be or is represented as a commercial feed, or it purports to contain or is represented as containing a commercial feed ingredient, unless the commercial feed or feed ingredient conforms to the definition prescribed by rule by the director.
(e)A word, statement, or other information required by or under authority of this act to appear on the label or labeling is not prominently placed on the commercial feed with the conspicuousness as compared with other words, statements, designs, or devices in the labeling and in such terms as to render it likely to be read and understood by the ordinary individual under customary conditions of purchase and use.
History: 1975, Act 120, Imd. Eff. June 26, 1975 ;-- Am. 2015, Act 83 , Eff. Oct. 1, 2015