Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Maine · Title 33: PROPERTY · Chapter 6-A: WORKING WATERFRONT COVENANTS

§133. Judicial actions

337 words·~2 min read·/me/title-33-property/chapter-6-a-working-waterfront-covenants/133·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

1. Owners; qualified holders. An action affecting a working waterfront covenant may be brought or intervened in by:
A. An owner of an interest in the real property burdened by the covenant; [PL 2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW).]
B. A qualified holder of the benefit of the working waterfront covenant; [PL 2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW).]
C. The municipality in which the real property burdened by the covenant is located; or [PL 2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW).]
D. The Attorney General. [PL 2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW).]
[PL 2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW).]
2. Power of court. The court has the following powers.
A. The court may enforce a working waterfront covenant by injunction or other proceeding at law or in equity. [PL 2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW).]
B. Acting in accordance with charitable trust principles, the court may modify, terminate or deny equitable enforcement of a working waterfront covenant in an action brought by a party pursuant to subsection 1 . In taking such an action, the court must find that, due to a change in circumstance, the covenant no longer serves the public interest in protecting or enhancing the commercial marine fisheries or related businesses of the State. The Attorney General must be made a party to any action under this paragraph and written notice must be provided to the Commissioner of Marine Resources. [PL 2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW).]
C. If the court modifies, terminates or denies equitable enforcement of a working waterfront covenant, the court may order payment by the landowner of money or other damages to the holder or the State, which shall apply the same in a manner consistent with the purposes of this law as approved by the court. [PL 2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW).]
[PL 2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW).]
The fact that a working waterfront property might be used for more valuable economic purposes may not be considered in determining whether a working waterfront covenant is no longer in the public interest. [PL 2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW).]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.