Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Maryland · Real Property

§ 8A-1301

438 words·~2 min read·/md/real-property/8a-1301

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§8A–1301.
(1)For any reason listed in paragraph
(2)of this subsection, a park owner may not:
(i)Bring or threaten to bring an action for possession against a resident;
(ii)Arbitrarily increase the rent or decrease the services to which a resident has been entitled; or
(iii)Terminate a periodic tenancy.
(2)A park owner may not take an action that is listed under paragraph
(1)of this subsection for any of the following reasons:
(i)Because the resident or the resident’s agent has provided written or actual notice of a good faith complaint about an alleged violation of the rental agreement, violation of law, or condition on the leased premises that is a substantial threat to the health or safety of occupants to:
1. The park owner; or
2. Any public agency against the park owner;
(ii)Because the resident or the resident’s agent has:
1. Filed a lawsuit against the park owner; or
2. Testified or participated in a lawsuit involving the park owner; or
(iii)Because the resident has participated in any tenant’s organization.
(1)A park owner’s violation of subsection
(a)of this section is a “retaliatory action”.
(2)A resident may raise a retaliatory action of a park owner:
(i)In defense to an action for possession; or
(ii)As an affirmative claim for damages resulting from a retaliatory action of a park owner occurring during a tenancy.
(c)If in any proceeding the court finds in favor of the resident because the park owner engaged in a retaliatory action, the court may enter judgment against the park owner for damages not to exceed the equivalent of 3 months’ rent, reasonable attorney’s fees, and court costs.
(d)An action by a park owner may not be deemed to be retaliatory for purposes of this section if the alleged retaliatory action occurs more than 6 months after a resident’s action that is protected under subsection (a)(2) of this section.
(e)As long as a park owner’s termination of a tenancy is not the result of a retaliatory action, nothing in this section may be interpreted to alter the park owner’s or the resident’s rights arising from breach of any provision of a rental agreement or rule, or either party’s right to terminate or not renew a rental agreement pursuant to the terms of the rental agreement or the provisions of other applicable law.
(f)If any county has enacted or enacts an ordinance comparable in subject matter to this section, this section shall supersede the provisions of the ordinance to the extent that the ordinance provides less protection to a resident.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.