Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Maryland · Public Safety

§ 3-107

462 words·~2 min read·/md/public-safety/3-107

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§3–107.
(1)Pending an investigatory, administrative charging committee, and trial board process, the chief may impose an emergency suspension with or without pay if the chief determines that such a suspension is in the best interest of the public.
(2)An emergency suspension without pay under this subsection may not exceed 30 days.
(3)A police officer who is suspended without pay under this subsection is entitled to receive back pay if an administrative charging committee determines not to administratively charge the police officer in connection with the matter on which the suspension is based.
(1)A chief or a chief’s designee may suspend a police officer without pay and suspend the police officer’s police powers on an emergency basis if the police officer is charged with:
(i)a disqualifying crime, as defined in § 5–101 of this article;
(ii)a misdemeanor committed in the performance of duties as a police officer; or
(iii)a misdemeanor involving dishonesty, fraud, theft, or misrepresentation.
(2)A police officer who was suspended without pay under this subsection is entitled to receive back pay if the criminal charge or charges against the police officer result in:
(i)a finding of not guilty;
(ii)an acquittal;
(iii)a dismissal; or
(iv)a nolle prosequi.
(1)The chief shall terminate the employment of a police officer who is convicted of a felony.
(2)The chief may terminate the employment of a police officer who:
(i)receives a probation before judgment for a felony; or
(ii)is convicted of:
1. a misdemeanor committed in the performance of duties as a police officer;
2. misdemeanor second degree assault; or
3. a misdemeanor involving dishonesty, fraud, theft, or misrepresentation.
(1)In connection with a disciplinary matter under this subtitle, a police officer may be required to submit to blood alcohol tests, blood, breath, or urine tests for controlled dangerous substances, polygraph examinations, or interrogations that specifically relate to the subject matter of the investigation.
(2)If a police officer is required to submit to a test, examination, or interrogation under paragraph
(1)of this subsection and the police officer refuses to do so, the law enforcement agency may commence an action that may lead to a punitive measure as a result of the refusal.
(i)If a police officer is required to submit to a test, examination, or interrogation under paragraph
(1)of this subsection, the results of the test, examination, or interrogation are not admissible or discoverable in a criminal proceeding against the police officer.
(ii)If a police officer is required to submit to a polygraph examination under paragraph
(1)of this subsection, the results of the polygraph examination are not admissible or discoverable in a criminal or civil proceeding against the police officer.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.