Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Maryland · Labor and Employment

§ 9-506

666 words·~3 min read·/md/labor-and-employment/9-506·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§9–506.
(a)A covered employee or a dependent of a covered employee is not entitled to compensation or benefits under this title as a result of:
(1)an intentional, self-inflicted accidental personal injury, compensable hernia, or occupational disease; or
(2)an attempt to injure or kill another.
(b)A covered employee or a dependent of a covered employee is not entitled to compensation or benefits under this title as a result of an accidental personal injury, compensable hernia, or occupational disease if:
(1)the accidental personal injury, compensable hernia, or occupational disease was caused solely by the effect on the covered employee of:
(i)a depressant, hallucinogenic, hypnotic, narcotic, or stimulant drug; or
(ii)another drug that makes the covered employee incapable of satisfactory job performance; and
(2)the drug was not administered or taken in accordance with the prescription of a physician.
(c)A covered employee or a dependent of a covered employee is not entitled to compensation or benefits under this title as a result of an accidental personal injury, compensable hernia, or occupational disease if the accidental personal injury, compensable hernia, or occupational disease was caused solely by the intoxication of the covered employee while on duty.
(1)In this subsection, “primary cause” means the cause that is first in importance.
(i)Except as provided in subparagraph
(ii)of this paragraph, a covered employee or dependent of a covered employee is not entitled to compensation or benefits under this title, except for medical benefits under §§ 9-660 and 9-661 of this title, as a result of an accidental personal injury, compensable hernia, or occupational disease, if the primary cause of the accidental personal injury, compensable hernia, or occupational disease was the effect on the covered employee of a controlled dangerous substance defined in § 5-101 of the Criminal Law Article or listed in Title 5, Subtitle 4 of the Criminal Law Article.
(ii)Compensation or benefits shall not be denied under subparagraph
(i)of this paragraph if the controlled dangerous substance was administered, taken, or used in accordance with the prescription of a physician and the administering, taking, or use of the controlled dangerous substance was not excessive or abusive.
(3)Except for medical benefits under §§ 9-660 and 9-661 of this title, a covered employee or dependent of a covered employee is not entitled to compensation or benefits under this title as a result of an accidental personal injury, compensable hernia, or occupational disease, if the primary cause of the accidental personal injury, compensable hernia, or occupational disease was the intoxication of the covered employee while on duty.
(e)A covered employee or a dependent of a covered employee is not entitled to compensation or benefits under this title as a result of an accidental personal injury, compensable hernia, or occupational disease if the accidental personal injury, compensable hernia, or occupational disease was caused by the willful misconduct of the covered employee.
(f)In a proceeding on a claim for compensation, there is, absent substantial evidence to the contrary, a presumption that an accidental personal injury, compensable hernia, or occupational disease:
(1)was not caused by the intent of the covered employee to injure or kill the covered employee or another individual;
(2)was not caused solely by the effect on the covered employee of:
(i)a depressant, hallucinogenic, hypnotic, narcotic, or stimulant drug; or
(ii)another drug that makes the covered employee incapable of satisfactory job performance; and
(3)was not caused solely by the intoxication of the covered employee while on duty.
(g)In a proceeding on a claim for compensation under subsection
(d)of this section, there is, absent substantial evidence to the contrary, a presumption that:
(1)the effect on the covered employee of a controlled dangerous substance was not the primary cause of the accidental personal injury, compensable hernia, or occupational disease; and
(2)the intoxication of the covered employee was not the primary cause of the accidental personal injury, compensable hernia, or occupational disease.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.