Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Maryland · Insurance

§ 15-10B-07

460 words·~2 min read·/md/insurance/15-10b-07·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§15–10B–07.
(1)Except as provided in paragraphs
(2)and
(3)of this subsection, all adverse decisions shall be made by a licensed physician, or a panel of other appropriate health care service reviewers with at least one physician on the panel, who is:
(i)board certified or eligible in the same specialty as the treatment under review; and
(ii)knowledgeable about the requested health care service or treatment through actual clinical experience.
(2)When the health care service under review is a mental health or substance abuse service, the adverse decision shall be made by a licensed physician, or a panel of other appropriate health care service reviewers with at least one licensed physician, selected by the private review agent who:
(i)is board certified or eligible in the same specialty as the treatment under review; or
(ii)is actively practicing or has demonstrated expertise in the substance abuse or mental health service or treatment under review.
(3)When the health care service under review is a dental service, the adverse decision shall be made by a licensed dentist, or a panel of other appropriate health care service reviewers with at least one licensed dentist on the panel who is knowledgeable about the requested health care service or treatment through actual clinical experience.
(b)All adverse decisions shall be made by a physician or a panel of other appropriate health care service reviewers who are not compensated by the private review agent in a manner that violates § 19–705.1 of the Health – General Article or that deters the delivery of medically appropriate care.
(c)Except as provided in subsection
(d)of this section, if a course of treatment has been preauthorized or approved for a patient, a private review agent may not retrospectively render an adverse decision regarding the preauthorized or approved services delivered to that patient.
(d)A private review agent may retrospectively render an adverse decision regarding preauthorized or approved services delivered to a patient if:
(1)the information submitted to the private review agent regarding the services to be delivered to the patient was fraudulent or intentionally misrepresentative;
(2)critical information requested by the private review agent regarding services to be delivered to the patient was omitted such that the private review agent’s determination would have been different had the agent known the critical information; or
(3)the planned course of treatment for the patient that was approved by the private review agent was not substantially followed by the provider.
(e)If a course of treatment has been preauthorized or approved for a patient, a private review agent may not revise or modify the specific criteria or standards used for the utilization review to make an adverse decision regarding the services delivered to that patient.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.