Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Maryland · Human Services

§ 9-307

450 words·~2 min read·/md/human-services/9-307

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§9–307.
Article VI. Rulemaking Functions of the Interstate Commission.
(a)The Interstate Commission shall promulgate and publish rules in order to effectively and efficiently achieve the purposes of the Compact.
(b)Rulemaking shall occur pursuant to the criteria set forth in this article and the bylaws and rules adopted pursuant thereto. Such rulemaking shall substantially conform to the principles of the “Model State Administrative Procedures Act,” 1981 Act, Uniform Laws Annotated, Vol. 15, p.1 (2000), or such other administrative procedures act, as the Interstate Commission deems appropriate consistent with due process requirements under the U.S. Constitution as now or hereafter interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court. All rules and amendments shall become binding as of the date specified, as published with the final version of the rule as approved by the Commission.
(c)When promulgating a rule, the Interstate Commission shall, at a minimum:
(1)publish the proposed rule’s entire text stating the reason for that proposed rule;
(2)allow and invite persons to submit written data, facts, opinions, and arguments, which information shall be added to the record, and be made publicly available;
(3)provide an opportunity for an informal hearing if petitioned by 10 or more persons; and
(4)promulgate a final rule and its effective date, if appropriate, based on input from state or local officials or interested parties.
(d)Not later than 60 days after a rule is promulgated, any interested person may file a petition in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia or in the federal district court where the Interstate Commission’s principal office is located for judicial review of such rule. If the court finds that the Interstate Commission’s action is not supported by substantial evidence, (as defined in the Model State Administrative Procedures Act) in the rulemaking record, the court shall hold the rule unlawful and set it aside.
(e)If a majority of the legislatures of the compacting states rejects a rule, those states may, by enactment of a statute or resolution in the same manner used to adopt the Compact, cause that such rule shall have no further force and effect in any compacting state.
(f)The existing rules governing the operation of the Interstate Compact on Juveniles superseded by this Act shall be null and void 12 months after the first meeting of the Interstate Commission created hereunder.
(g)Upon determination by the Interstate Commission that an emergency exists, it may promulgate an emergency rule which shall become effective immediately upon adoption, provided that the usual rulemaking procedures provided hereunder shall be retroactively applied to said rule as soon as reasonably possible, but no later than 90 days after the effective date of the emergency rule.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.