Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Maryland · Environment

§ 9-1704

561 words·~3 min read·/md/environment/9-1704

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§9–1704.
(1)If a county with a population greater than 150,000 determines it cannot achieve a reduction of 35% of its solid waste stream under § 9–505 of this title, the county shall:
(i)Conduct a public hearing on the proposed reduction that may be conducted jointly with other public hearings or meetings; and
(ii)Publish notice of the time and place of the public hearing, together with a summary of the justification for the proposed reduction, in a newspaper of general circulation in the county once a week for 2 consecutive weeks before the hearing in the county.
(2)The Secretary shall review a county plan that does not meet the 35% recycling goal to determine whether the county’s maximum goal, as stated in the plan, can be demonstrated to have a reasonable basis.
(3)The Secretary shall require revision of a county plan if, pursuant to a review under paragraph
(2)of this subsection, the county’s determination of its maximum goal is found to be unsupported by competent, material, and substantial evidence in light of the entire plan as submitted.
(1)If a county with a population less than 150,000 determines it cannot achieve a reduction of 20% of its solid waste stream under § 9–505 of this title, the county shall:
(i)Conduct a public hearing on the proposed reduction that may be conducted jointly with other public hearings or meetings; and
(ii)Publish notice of the time and place of the public hearing, together with a summary of the justification for the proposed reduction in a newspaper of general circulation in the county once a week for 2 consecutive weeks before the hearing in the county.
(2)The Secretary shall review a county plan that does not meet the 20% recycling goal to determine whether the county’s maximum goal, as stated in the plan, can be demonstrated to have a reasonable basis.
(3)The Secretary shall require revision of a county plan if, pursuant to a review under paragraph
(2)of this subsection, the county’s determination of its maximum goal is found to be unsupported by competent, material, and substantial evidence in light of the entire plan as submitted.
(i)Subject to subparagraph
(ii)of this paragraph, when calculating a county’s recycling rate for the purposes of this subsection, a county with a population of less than 100,000 may combine its recycling rate with the recycling rates of one or more adjacent counties.
(ii)A county may not use the recycling rate calculation in this paragraph for more than 5 consecutive years.
(iii)Subject to subparagraph
(iv)of this paragraph, each county that elects to use the recycling rate calculation in this paragraph shall submit a letter of concurrence from the highest elected official of the county to the Secretary:
1. That states the county’s agreement to combine its recycling rate calculation with the recycling rate calculation of an adjacent county; and
2. At the same time the annual report required under § 9–1705(b) of this subtitle is submitted.
(iv)The annual report required under § 9–1705(b) of this subtitle shall be submitted as one report for the counties that elect to use the recycling rate calculation under this paragraph.
(v)The Secretary shall calculate one recycling rate for the counties that elect to use the recycling rate calculation in accordance with this paragraph.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.