Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Maryland · Courts and Judicial Proceedings

§ 10-409

506 words·~2 min read·/md/courts-and-judicial-proceedings/10-409·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§10–409.
(a)Within 30 days after the expiration of the total period of an order, including each extension entered under § 10–408 of this subtitle, or within 30 days after denial of an application for an order or extension, the judge who passed the order or denied the application shall report to the Administrative Office of the Courts:
(1)The fact that an order or extension was applied for;
(2)The kind of order or extension applied for;
(3)The fact that the order or extension was granted as applied for, was modified, or was denied;
(4)The period of interceptions authorized by the order and the number and duration of any extensions of the order;
(5)The offense specified in the order or application or extension of an order;
(6)The identity of the applying investigative or law enforcement officer and agency making the application and the person authorizing the application; and
(7)The nature of the facilities from which or the place where communications were to be intercepted.
(b)In January of each year, the Attorney General, the State Prosecutor, and the State’s Attorneys shall report to the Administrative Office of the Courts:
(1)The information required by subsection
(a)of this section with respect to each application for an order or extension made during the preceding calendar year;
(2)A general description of the interceptions made under the order or extension, including
(i)the approximate nature and frequency of incriminating communications intercepted,
(ii)the approximate nature and frequency of other communications intercepted,
(iii)the approximate number of persons whose communications were intercepted, and
(iv)the approximate nature, amount, and cost of the manpower and other resources used in the interceptions;
(3)The number of arrests resulting from interceptions made under the order or extension and the offenses for which arrests were made;
(4)The number of trials resulting from the interceptions;
(5)The number of motions to suppress made with respect to the interceptions and the number granted or denied;
(6)The number of convictions resulting from the interceptions and the offenses for which the convictions were obtained and a general assessment of the importance of the interceptions; and
(7)The information required by paragraphs
(2)through
(6)of this subsection with respect to orders or extensions obtained in a preceding calendar year.
(c)Subject to § 2–1257 of the State Government Article, in February of each year, the State Court Administrator shall transmit to the General Assembly a full and complete report concerning the number of applications for orders authorizing or approving the interception of wire or oral communications and the number of orders and extensions granted or denied during the preceding calendar year. The report shall include a summary and analysis of the data required to be filed with the Administrative Office by subsections
(a)and
(b)of this section. The State Court Administrator is authorized to issue binding regulations dealing with the content and form of the reports required to be filed by subsections
(a)and
(b)of this section.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.