Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Massachusetts · Part III — COURTS, JUDICIAL OFFICERS AND PROCEEDINGS IN CIVIL CASES · Title I — THE GENERAL LAWS, AND EXPRESS REPEAL OF CERTAIN ACTS AND RESOLVES · Chapter 222

Section 27: Tamper-evident technologies to perform notarial acts; recording of documents

208 words·~1 min read·/ma/part-iii/title-i/chapter-222/27·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 27.
(a)A notary public may select 1 or more tamper-evident technologies to perform notarial acts with respect to electronic records. A person shall not require a notary public to perform a notarial act with respect to an electronic record with a technology that the notary public has not selected. Any technology approved by the state secretary pursuant to subsection
(h)of section 28 and selected by a notary public shall require the notary public's electronic signature and electronic seal to be:
(i)unique to the notary public;
(ii)capable of independent verification;
(iii)retained under the sole control of the notary public; and
(iv)attached to or logically associated with the electronic record in a tamper-evident manner.
(b)A tangible copy of an electronic record shall be accepted as the equivalent of an original document for purposes of recording said copy; provided, however, that:
(i)the copy contains a notarial certificate that satisfies all requirements for an original document to be accepted for recording;
(ii)the copy satisfies all requirements for recording an original document set forth in chapters 183 and 185, as applicable; and
(iii)the notary public executing the notarial certificate certifies that the tangible copy is an accurate copy of the electronic record.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.